|
|
Iran warns it can fire 11,000 rockets in one minute if attacked
By: Ria Novosti on: 20.10.2007 [20:32 ] (3189 reads)
|
(2448 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Iran warns it can fire 11,000 rockets in one minute if attacked
16:15 | 20/ 10/ 2007
TEHRAN, October 20 (RIA Novosti) - Iran has the capability to fire 11,000 rockets at enemy bases within one minute if the country is attacked, a top commander in the Revolutionary Guards Corps said on Saturday.
"Within the first minute of any attack by enemies against our country, the missile and artillery unit of the ground force is capable of firing 11,000 missiles and shells at targets that are known to us," Gen. Mahmoud Chaharbaghi, the top missile commander of the Revolutionary Guards, said on national TV.
Iran has precise data on the deployment of potential attackers' military bases in the region, he said.
"A possible war will not last long, because within days we will reduce our enemies to ashes. The enemy must ask himself what losses he is prepared to suffer for his stupidity," the commander said.
The commander's comments come four days after United States President George W. Bush's warning that if Iran's nuclear program is not stopped, World War III could break out. The United States has military bases in several countries near Iran, including thousands of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, which share borders with the Islamic Republic.
In response to Bush's comments, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini said on Thursday: "Statements of this kind reflect America's expansionist goals, which will surely weaken international security and ignite the U.S. government's militarist policy."
Washington, which along with many other Western nations accuses Iran of pursing a secret nuclear weapons program, despite Iranian denials, has refused to rule out military action against the country in the long-running international dispute.
Bush's comments at a White House news conference came a day after President Vladimir Putin's visit to Tehran, where the Russian leader said he saw no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons.
Putin's trip to Iran for a summit of Caspian littoral states, the first visit by a Russian or Soviet leader since Joseph Stalin traveled to Iran in 1943, provoked concerns in the West over increasingly close ties between Moscow and Tehran. The summit resulted in a five-way agreement that no Caspian nations would allow the use of their territories for a military strike against any of them.
http://en.rian.ru/world/20071020/84750087.html
by gmmonko on 21.10.2007 [06:45 ]
|
|
|
That is all what needs to be done.
|
by djandjolik on 21.10.2007 [06:53 ]
|
|
|
"Washington, which along with many other Western nations accuses Iran of pursing a secret nuclear weapons program"
is similar accusation as to Iraq prior to the invasion in 2003, and now Alan Greenscam said it is due to vast Oil ad Gas reserve and Iraq will be US protectorate. Iran and Iraq combined command 40-50% world Oil and Gas reserve!!!!
|
by gmmonko on 21.10.2007 [08:14 ]
|
|
|
...well that is the idea, but it lacks the success US thought it would have in Iraq. Iran is not on the table anymore.
|
by iron_clay on 21.10.2007 [09:40 ]
|
|
|
Iran is addressing a US target when the attacker will be Zionist Israel.
Israel will dummy to the north but the main attack force will use Saudi air space to attack from the south.
US and UK will be attacking Iran defences so it's good to know that 11,000 missiles will already be on their way in the first minute because in the second minute these defence missile sites will not exist on this planet.
The problem is they will not make their mark in Israel because this attack can and will be stopped.
Now if Iran had a way to dump these 11,000 missiles on Israel in the first minute, the game plan has a chance to play out in their favour.
Their favour being that their first strike nation will pay a similar price they will pay ... but that isn't going to happen.
Some of these targets Iran is looking at are UK military in Iraq and Brown has said that UK WILL ATTACK with missiles if their forces are attacked by Iran.
The French will be right there ... oh not active till the gulf and oil shipments are threatened but once that happens, and it will, the French are also going to be attacking Iran defences.
Three super powers, all armed with nukes and capable of delivering them against Iran without nukes and next to no active war record.
In a world of Right justice I'd put my money on Iran.
This is not a world of Right Justice ... we're looking at another blood bath.
Neal
|
by djandjolik on 21.10.2007 [12:30 ]
|
|
|
France, Britain and US has come as the "Victor" of a war??? None since the WWII!!!. France get kick out from all of their colonies, Britain same lost all their colonies after WWII, US not a single war, only won one war in his history with Spain in the Philippine a century ago. But surely they can do havoc to a countries but not taking the country totally.
|
by eureka on 21.10.2007 [23:08 ]
|
|
|
would stop revealing their fighting strategies to the enemy; unless they have some other unpleasant surprises in store, they need to keep their mouths shut.
Do the Iranians think that the Iraqi Resistance would have been so successful at thwarting the american takeover of Iraq if they had telephoned the american commanders every time they placed their IEDs?
NO. To forewarn is to forearm. All that is doing is allowing the enemy to refine his strategy for attacking you. I am very sure that the american military is glad to see these releases every time.
For the last time Iran: Stop telling the enemy where your strengths lie.
|
by dit on 22.10.2007 [00:11 ]
|
|
|
But I also hope that it's 5 to 1o times this number. So if they say 11000 today let the surprise be 55000 to 110000 when it really counts. The Saudis should be chased off the holy land of the prophet Mohamed. They should be smashed to smithereens them and their crazy wahabi belief.
|
by TerraHertz on 22.10.2007 [00:59 ]
|
|
|
I don't think the Iranian leadership are so stupid as to give away useful strategies in media announcements. Also, don't forget this '11,000 rockets' thing comes right after a little chat with Putin, master of misdirection.
So the situation is unchanged - we have no idea what tricks the Iranians have up their sleeves, nor how they will react to the various possible attack scenarios. Count it as just words to keep the Zionazi mattresses wet.
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 22.10.2007 [01:44 ]
|
|
|
h ttp://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8607150589
Notice the article say "rockets" not "missiles." So, I'm guessing that these are some upgraded version of the Katyusha rockets perhaps where many rockets can be fired from each mobile launcher.
Brigadier General Chaharbaghi differentiats rockets from missiles by the guidance and control system. Rockets are much less expensive than missiles.
The rockets being discussed in the article have a range of 150 km, while the revolutionary gaurd plans are receiving more in the future that have a range of 250 km.
So, these are not the Shahab miissiles that can reach Israel. These are more like rockets that can reach US bases near Iran's borders.
We're talking about 90 miles translated for non-metrics USA heads.
So, if the US goes after Iran's well-hidden, long-range missiles, air-defense artillery, SAM installations, and nuclear reactors, these rockets and even more short range missiles will be free to attack US bases in Iraq and Afghanistan close to Iran's borders.
This is, of course, while Iranian commandoes and guerrillas fire mortars into those bases.
|
by iron_clay on 22.10.2007 [03:04 ]
|
|
|
Since all of these nations have openly said they would take part under different circumstances that since when.
If you had been watching the news you would have seen what I said above .. that's since when.
@ eureka .. the first casualty of war is the truth.
From what I have seen most of the info Iran has put out has been greatly exagerated to be in their favour if not complete dis-information.
Sorry but the west aren't the only ones who can lie to save themselves ... that trait follows man as a whole and has no reguard to colour or religion.
Neal
|
by iron_clay on 22.10.2007 [03:15 ]
|
|
|
IS I'll let you know when I'm feeling like I need an extreme optimist.
Your truely wonderful.
The one thing going for Iran is that the official war hasn't begun or at least been reported yet.
UK and US already have forces well within Iran and the fact that they can get there and opperate in safety doesn't bode well at all.
When these 4 IS, US, UK, France make the move I hope you can be as optimistic a week after.
I doubt even 2 Iranian missiles will reach Zionist Israel.
I'm certain several US ships will go down in the golf but I'm also sure Israel will drop at least one of them ... the first one.
You asked what currency you should take back to Iran.
I've another suggestion ... "Rocks" ... they will be in much demand in 12 months time.
Neal
|
by laertes on 22.10.2007 [10:25 ]
|
|
|
Well, let's hope it is true. If the Patriot missiles can shoot down 90% of them , the yankees will still be hit by a barrage of 1100 rockets - an event they won't forget so soon.
|
by IraqiResistance on 22.10.2007 [10:29 ]
|
|
|
So what do you suggest, that Iran bends over and parts its cheeks?
|
by Syrian on 22.10.2007 [11:04 ]
|
|
|
Severed American sailor's heads. What else are you going to do with them, all of them turning up on the coast in a day.
Some of you seem to think Iran is being overestimated ... but who is saber rattling? They don't want a propoganda victory so they wouldn't overestimate, they would underestimate. They want a quick war and people's general support, so they need to make Iran seem like its easily defeatable.
|
by iron_clay on 22.10.2007 [11:31 ]
|
|
|
NEVER !!
But I think a good hard dose of reality may do the world of good.
The problem is people can't take the reality pill ... they don't respond, they react and badly.
Look buddy I have no qualm with you or anyone else who's anti-the US Zionist wars, but the single most common mistake anyone can make when entering a war is under-estimating their enemy.
The second most common mistake is over-estimating their own ability.
I cringe when I see it and on this site I see it all the time.
There's a real long string of "Certain Losses of a war" but thems two are top every time.
I think in reality, Iran really pharqued up big time sending the Brits back. That was the turning point of the war.
Their actions were one of an act of war, and as such if I had been in control of Iran at the time those Brits would still be chained to mobile defence missiles and the images of them crying to Brown would be getting posted all over the net every day.
Let the Israelis make their strike with 15 Brits hanging off the front of Iranian defence missiles.
Where is the support (for Israel) going to be coming from?? the families of the 15??
Iran's done it before ... their enemy does it now ... so why let the slime go in the hopes of getting your own guys back ... which didn't work anyway.
War is about killing people ... thems that have seen war know that's all it is .. killing people and it doesn't matter how they die so long as you get the last shot in ... if it's the first shot as well then great.
Any and every lever has to be exploited to the max.
You just can't go giving opportunities away ... like expecting your enemy to have scruples to only shoot when you know he's there.
If you see the shot at 300 metres take it, there's not going to be another one because the next thing that's going through your mind is that guys bullet.
The problem I see with the present Iran leader is that the prick is too nice and nice people don't win wars nor do stupid ones.
He needs to go eat a dead billy goat and grow some ugly and get a lot smarter.
He's played some real transparent ploys to gain the advantage and none of them have paid off, not one has been taken up.
His enemy is way better as lies and deception than he is and they've seen his moves every time.
In saying that I really like the guy but he's just not the right man to be heading into a war with.
Neal
|
by iron_clay on 22.10.2007 [11:47 ]
|
|
|
Reality check.
The reason the patriot missiles will miss 1000 of those 1100 will be because the rockets were off target anyway and they didn't bother to take them down.
That leaves you with 100 hits on US military targets.
The IS, US, UK and France on the other hand are going to be striking high population points claiming them to be defence sites and remember the winners of the war gets to write both the news and the history books.
Remember also that the USA is not going to suffer even one bomb....
If Syria or Iran is lucky enough to land a missile or two in Israel, the chances of striking a high cost target is way lower that the other way round.
The likelyhood of Iran hitting their enemy with nukes is so low it's not worth considering, but their enemy will begin their attack with nukes.
Remember Israel doesn't give a fuck if China and Russia get a good dose of nuke dust.
Reality ... Please Russia and China ... make your move when the Zionist make theirs or we'll all be talking Zionist in 5 years to come.
Neal
|
by Syrian on 22.10.2007 [12:32 ]
|
|
|
Contrary to what George Bush said back then, there is no evidence that the missiles deflected any of the incoming SCUDs.
The fact remains that they are more likely to shoot down US aircrafts than missiles. Thus I must say they should rename them the "traitor" missiles, hahaha.
I'm not even going to mention the utter failure of US and IsraHelli systems during the last lebanese war. Even when the hezbollah was largely holding back. (to this day I don't understand why.)
Anyway, I don't see the US launching 22,000 (at least) interceptors to targets ALL over the middle east. Good on you Iran, tell it like it is. I know for sure your ace in the hole is still not being revealed.
|
by Syrian on 22.10.2007 [12:51 ]
|
|
|
Please come back down to earth, and study what happened in last year's summer. I'm going to focus on Syria for now, since you mentioned us.
Israhell was humilated with 400 missiles landing on it on the last day of the war. The funny thing is hezbollah (whose fighting group was made up of 4000 elite commandos) was just doing a spring clean of their old missiles. They held back majorly.
Do you really, really, TRULY, believe Syria, who has been stockpiling missiles since 1990, and who according to intelligence assests has the smallest ratio of missiles to launchers in the world, would have to be "lucky enough to land a missile or two in Israel"? Come on??? Syria has been ramping up her Scud-D variant since the end of the war on Iraq's people. All the weapons, facilities, technology centers are deep underground, well underneath large mountains and cannot be penetrated by any weapon held by world powers today.
This is not a matter of muscle flexing, its a matter of survival. There is no other consequence stopping IsraHell from using unconventional weapons on Syria or Lebanon.
Be reasonable. It is without question that Syria can. The biggest question is if Syria will. Launching such an attack will definitely mean Mutual destruction, so Syria options are actually quite limited. Conventional warfare is costly and not in Syria's favour while the US is nearby.
If Syria is attacked in a major way and the government does nothing, there's going to be blood flowing in the streets.
Anyway, I hope I haven't revealed too much about Syria's strategy, but I think most of this is known to our enemies anyway.
Now moving back to Iran.
Iran doesn't have to gain air supremacy over the US to win. All it has to do is sink two carriers, destroy three major base in Afghanistan/Iraq/Kuwait/Khaleej and the war is pretty much over. The USA simply doesn't have the capacity required to take on Iran. It's strong worldwide, but no power in the world can focus all its strength on one target and still maintain their hemogony. Think about it.
All it has to do is destroy dimona and Israel is finished (since all the have left is their tarnished image). The occupiers will flee in droves back home to europe where they belong.
|
by Syrian on 22.10.2007 [13:35 ]
|
|
|
ht tp://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2691726.ece
"SAS raiders enter Iran to kill gunrunners"
"BRITISH special forces have crossed into Iran several times in recent months as part of a secret border war against the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s Al-Quds special forces, defence sources have disclosed."
Not so secret anymore, idiots. I think Eric Arthur Blair already debunked these "non-existent" character stories.
The article continues
"The unreported fighting straddles the border between Iran and Iraq"
Unreported? Isn't the article itself an oxymoron then?
That's enough cow's dropings for one day.
|
by Throw_Off_The_Killer on 22.10.2007 [15:48 ]
|
|
|
Because the Western aggressor countries lack any foresight whatsoever, they have already lost.
It is foolish to discuss war in terms of "he who kills the most, wins". Any attack upon Iran will certainly kill many innocent people and cause much destruction, as in Lebanon last year. But what came of it? Hizbullah enjoys greater popular support and respect and Israelis are fleeing to live elsewhere.
So what will come of an attack upon Iran? How will the world have changed when the dust settles?
|
by IraqiResistance on 22.10.2007 [15:59 ]
|
|
|
It seems to me that Iran/Ahmadinejad knowing USA/West is intent on attacking and subjugating it is prepared psychologically for a life or death struggle and is prepared even to be nuked if need be.
Rather than rolling over like a good dog it knows it has the capability to inflict very serious damage on the attacker. Seems to me they are right too, remember that the Iranians are not fat lazy retards full of junk food chems! Also, the Americans behave with arrogance as displayed in Iraq and their solution to everything is technology and money..well, lets see their delusions up against real live humans..Or even view it as God versus Satan!
Note also that Putin has the intent it would seem to stand by Iran..My moneys on the Iranians.
|
by IraqiResistance on 22.10.2007 [16:17 ]
|
|
|
You say: "The IS, US, UK and France on the other hand are going to be striking high population points claiming them to be defence sites"
The Iranians have 70 millions and a healthy birthrate, they are prepared to lose a few millions if need be, the alternative does not bear thinking about.
Thats called balls Iron_Clay and a healthy appreciation of life.
|
by verve on 23.10.2007 [02:13 ]
|
|
|
did you see Arnie today?, he looked like a deer caught in the lights with a sore bum hole. All those fires and no military, no choppers, no man power, no fuck all as kazillion dollar houses burn, baby burn, divine retribution if such exists. Hard to feel sorry as they bleat about what they have lost, while over in Iraq their asshole neighbours are rapin' and pilliage'n and blow'n people to bits. Slap it into them.
|
by poiuytr on 23.10.2007 [06:52 ]
|
|
|
Hence Bush begs Putin to figure it all out today.
11K missiles? That's a lot of targets the US of A child murderer beast has to hit if they want to tango. And they have to hit them 100% successfully and what's more, right in the same nanosecond.
Knowing the US cretinous smear pilots, they can't find a single silo.
So you get 5K missiles going up the US rumps of the Iraqi raping gorillas (notice I'm branching into more species), 5K go to Israel since they've been instigating the violance anyhow, and 1K go to EU for good measure.
This cleansing of the barbarian beast is followed by Hormuz shut down and Venezuela oil shut off to the US disease and Russian shut off of oil and gas to EU monsters.
Those who survive in the west will look at 100USD/litre of petrol and food worth the entire west realestate catalogue.
And that's precisely why there's been an ongoing coup in the US and why even the most crazed of the US child murdering monstrous beastly vermin have not but run their snouts.
Typical west game: vulgarity, threats. Cowards. Look at Neal. Claims he's antiestablishment, antiBush, and here... shit. He's just a dirty western dwelling monkey like the rest of the baboons.
Yeah, it's done. The west has been surrounded and it's up to it whether it wants to walk out with hands in the air, lie down face down, or go down in the burning house. As long as Bush command is in charge, the entire west populace is sentenced to totality and police lockdown. I can't think of anyone else deserving that more.
Let jubilation reign across the Freeworld for the yank baboon castrated little coward beast with jew rite sliced up dicks manure pile of rubbish birthed by a diseased transvestite whore is a thing of the past now.
|
by iron_clay on 23.10.2007 [07:53 ]
|
|
|
I mentioned Syria because long ago the Zionists made it clear that to attack Iran they had to take hold and control Syria first or at the same time.
Otherwise the Zionists are going to be defending on two sides.
RE " Israhell was humilated with 400 missiles landing"
Cool but not really. What was the body count, was it anything like half the Lebonese body count?
See it's ok if you want to play "I'll take 10 of your's and you'll take 100 of mine" but that's no way to win a war.
RE: Iranians have 70 millions and a healthy birthrate, they are prepared to lose a few millions
We are not talking about conventional weapons that kill once and stop, we're looking an nukes, DU, clusters, mines that keep on killing for 50 years.
The outcome on the day has little to do with this war when the children for the next 5 generations are also murdered.
Tell that to your "healthy birthrate" or even better go ask any pregnant woman in Iraq what her greates fears are.
This is why I said the US and Israel will not be touched by this war.
RE: Do you really, really, TRULY, believe Syria ... line.
Unfortunately yes I do, Brother I'd do anything to convince myself the other way but I've been over this so many times looking from every angle and the outcome is never good.
Have you considered the US Temple in Israel ??
ht tp://www.iron-clay.com/the_temple.html
Do you know where it is and what it's for?
That is where the US are going to make their stand.
RE: Note also that Putin has the intent it would seem to stand by Iran..My moneys on the Iranians.
Without 2 more super powers entering this war, Syria and Iran do not look a great place to be.
Sadly after all the crap I don't trust Putin to act in Iran's defence until well after it's too late for Iran.
Russia, China, UK, France and US are all locked into their own Beast and will not unlock for small fish.
It's not in Russia's interest to step in to stop this war, Russia and the US are battling for nuclear fuel market position, and Iran is attempting to get there too.
Notice if you will that both US and Russia wanted to build nuclear plants in Iran until Iran wanted to supply their own fuel.
Russia is OUT if Iran is looking for active help no matter what's been said in the last few weeks.
I believe China will probably take Taiwan when the Israeli strike begins because the US is going to be a wee bit busy for a few days so China is out.
To Iran:
RE: All it has to do is sink two carriers, destroy three major base in Afghanistan/Iraq/Kuwait/Khaleej and the war is pretty much over.
"All it has to do is" Ouch, you do tend to underestimate your enemy.
Only if that was true and so easy.
It's quite likely the Israelis will drop the first US carrier to ensure the braindead public swing in and support, but the war is intended to be short and not an invasion but a air strike on plants that can make Iran a force to be recognised in the commercial world.
Remember this is a commercial war over market and money.
RE: Israel ... The occupiers will flee in droves back home to europe where they belong.
I thought they were going to Canada ?? (:o)) they are going to hell and the sooner the better.
RE: Rather than rolling over like a good dog
Please consider this ... If you were the New World Order and you had a "Problem Child" what would you ensure ??
The NWO already knows the US aren't going to be in the running after this and have setup Germany to take it's place.
Neal
|
by iron_clay on 23.10.2007 [07:55 ]
|
|
|
I have no idea what you're talking about, nothing there makes any sense to me at all.
I don't have TV so if "Arnie" who ever she is, was on TV I gladly missed her.
If you want to reword it go for broke but you lost me bro.
Neal
|
by Syrian on 23.10.2007 [10:51 ]
|
|
|
The reason why they don't need to destroy much for the USA to be finished is simple. I've already said why:
"The USA simply doesn't have the capacity required to take on Iran. It's strong worldwide, but no power in the world can focus all its strength on one target and still maintain their hegemony was sic. Think about it."
Contrary to what might seem like was the case, it takes a lot of effort and time to coordinate a large assault against a country you don't border. Nothing short of launching ICBMs and nuke-laden B-2 armada against Iran would translate into a victory (though genocidal) for the US.
Perhaps this is why you are so pessmistic? I suppose, like you said in this scenario it all depends on a response from Russia or China. I doubt they would care to be honest. Even if Iran responds by destroying IsraHell, they still wouldn't care. In this kind of scenario, Assymetric warfare cannot succeed.
|
by Syrian on 23.10.2007 [10:57 ]
|
|
|
ht tp://sundaymag.ca/index.php?id=759
"SUNDAY EXCLUSIVE: THE BATTLE OF BAGHDAD & THE UNREPORTED NEUTRON BOMB"
|
by Syrian on 23.10.2007 [11:17 ]
|
|
|
Zoraida: Can the excellent article "Iraq, Ramzaj and a Neutron Bomb" be brought back online?
ht tp://www.iraq-war.ru/article/27537
|
by Bl4ckP0pe on 23.10.2007 [12:20 ]
|
|
|
you are confused, but let me explain - attempting to superimpose your weak-minded prophesies (derived from someone else's worthless interpretation of bible fiction) onto current analysis of political/military affairs in the real world does not make for clarity. It makes you sound like a born-again skYanki loon, who expects to be 'raptured' at any moment.
e.g. when you blabber such lunacy as "NWO have setup Germany to replace USA", it amply demonstrates your disconnect from reality.
You have claimed on this board to be "apolitical" - and I wondered why the quotes? - but now I think that best translates to: "proud of my political ignorance, but always happy to flaunt it".
You also badly overestimate the relevance of your own opinion to the outcome of any given issue - and display a fragile, unforgiving ego when each new prophecy flops on its face. So you forever continue ranting about how Ahmadinejad failed to follow your sage counsel, should have strapped those 15 gutless Britzie GameBoyz to whatever, thus fulfilling the IC prophecy-de-jour, and altering the course of world history.
Thanks for the laughs, but you are strictly comic-relief.
PS: If the skYanki pig is stupid enough to launch an aggression against Iran, the rapist's snout will be smashed, then his balls chopped of and roasted, just for fun, before a ceremonial dagger is hammered slowly through his thick skull to finalise the spectacle.
Everyone has a part to play - Rome wasn't burnt in a day!
|
by djandjolik on 23.10.2007 [14:33 ]
|
|
|
Armed Forces is impossible task for the US, given the closing Caspian littoral States to provide linchpin to attack Iran as well as Gulf states including Saudi Arabia. The only place that willing to provide launch path is Israel and Iraq. There is no other states that is willing to provide launching path to attack Iran including what is called "New Europe". There is no gain at all by providing their country as a launching path to attack peaceful Iranian country. Attacking Iran is close to impossible in the near future, after the visit of Russian President to Iran.
|
by poiuytr on 23.10.2007 [20:42 ]
|
|
|
Really! Black Pope, more sermons! I mean that!
You write real well. Beautiful analogies, words like snout and metaphors. Just great word paintings of art. And of course, you're a thinking human, which helps, with right views.
You need to write more. I try reaching your standard but alas not all are literary endowed.
You see if you don't join in more oft, it's monkeys and racist yank baboons taking over each threat with their mindless spew. Notice how nearly all west baboon contributions are only about them.
All neal is interested in is his bible-based cult. Murdered children by his gov't are of no interest at all. All that americunt, cracksmokerwhore care about is posting racist stuff and exonerating bush cabal from the crimes. All that the UK correspondent lot manages to barf out here is typically just on their peace music festivals gatherings of has beens where the US crotch cleaners go wet their knickers en masse. All that econ cares about is his US wallet. He knows the score as far as the decay of dollar but his political views concern only his wallet and re-establishment of US wealth. He spares no thought for the maimed children by his diseased gov't and allows no room to debate the US crimes and just punishments for it. Then there are those western bitches here who aren't even worth a mention but add to the general chaos of nonsense natter to deflect and obscure factual data regarding the western disease.
There are others great contributors here but this site badly needs your eloquent touch.
|
by poiuytr on 24.10.2007 [03:09 ]
|
|
|
Reprint for those too lazy to follow the link. In response to some bullshit yank mutha wingeing over its dead son "Brat-ly" sniped off in Iraq, BlackPope states:
I disagree with Momma, poor darling 'Bradley', or whatever this oxygen-thief was called, SHOULD have met that nice Mr. 7.62mm moving at supersonic speed in the opposite direction, which is exactly what did happen - thus serving justice, and I for one heartily salute the man who adminstered consequences to this diseased swine in human form. May his zinc coffin be sealed with 50 star-spangled rivets, and a dunce's cap fitted to his vacant GameBoy skullpan in like fashion.
Is there some moral fault in approving to see an aggressive rapist have his nose bitten off and his balls kicked so hard he chokes, by an intended victim who turns out to be a lot less defenceless than he had hoped?
No, on the contrary, I say such humiliating lessons are the only way a bastard rapist will ever learn the error of his ways!
Similarly, the sYanki military forces in Iraq are the bastard aggressive rapists, warcriminals of the lowest variety, who have, by stepping across the Iraqi border whilst armed and breathing, voluntarily assumed the risk of every punishment the intended victims can muster in self-defence, including lethal force. So do not complain when the risk materialises in reality, GameBoyz — you are the author of your own richly-deserved misfortune, fools!
Any human with an intact brain and sense of justice will naturally rejoice to see such filth eliminated from the face of the earth, most particularly by his upstanding intended victims — this is a wonderful example for the rest of humanity to follow.
Only very sick and brainwashed USaNazi sociopaths, convinced of their 'Gawd-given' manifest destiny Herrenvolk status, could believe the aggressor deserves to succeed in his nefarious crimes and escape with impunity. To hear these cretinous rapists whine and cry, "Gee Momma, why-oh-why dids ah havta gots mah balls blown off, where's da luv, y'all?", that is truely the most amusing part — which only proves that some fools you just can't reach, even with a most excellent IED, or a sniper's rifle. Still, that's no reason to stop trying, until you have worked through the whole ugly pile, right down to the last little piggy ... ";0))
What say you US-Loser/Britzie/JAZI readers, did 'Bradley' fully deserve to be thusly nailed? Justify your answer using rational moral logic, if you know what that means.
And keep up the great work, noble Iraqi Resistance!
|
by IvanGrozny on 24.10.2007 [09:31 ]
|
|
|
accuracy. Doubtful Iran has the capacity to achieve even 10% of this claim.
Within 1 minute? What are all their hand loaded, towed or truck mounted - artillery rockets, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, howitzers, and mortars connected to 1 fire control system that automatically aims and fires all weapons at the same time?
Obviously not, not even in perfect conditions with no enemy attacks. Achieving this under aerial and naval bombardment would be even more difficult if not nearly impossible.
It would be a logistics nightmare. Just the support crews would number in the 100,000's, and this is only for Mortars, with 1 missile they would need dozens of crew members. Iran simply lacks the manpower and material resources to accomplish what this General said.
This proves Sun Tzu is not taught in Iranian Military Academies because he said: "if strong feign weakness and disorder so that your enemy becomes arrogant".
The Iranians are doing the opposite and harming themselves. They make boasts thinking this scares their enemy, but Americans are numerous and powerful and they are not impressed. It is time to be humble and silent, Iranians would win faster this way.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
