|
|
THE SYRIAN MINCER (REVISITED)
By: adrian on: 19.10.2012 [12:44 ] (526 reads)
|
THE SYRIAN MINCER (REVISITED).
|
|
(3620 bytes) [nc]
|
|
During WW1, the Germans soon realised that they were in a war of attrition. The side that could kill the most of their enemy would win. So they devised a cunning plan! They feigned an attempted break-through in the French sector at Verdun. But their true aim was to seize a site that was sacred to French pride, knowing that local geography, heavy artillery, and the machine gun would demand a high price in French lives in any effort to retake it. The strategy was called “The Mincer”. There were hundreds of thousands of casualties, the army mutinied – it almost worked!
Now fast-forward to 2012. After their victories in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, the Sunni fundamentalists are on a roll! Who will be their next target? Russia in the Caucasus and Central Asia? China in Xinxiang? The world oil supply in the Gulf? French colonies in North Africa? Or Israel itself! The Sunni are a threat to many, including their own rulers. Their fighters must now know that Allah is on THEIR side. How is the world to eliminate this threat?
The greatest problem is that the Sunni resistance have so far refused open battle against superior military forces. Instead they opt for insurgency, conserving their resources, and using them wisely. How are they to be beaten? The plan is to trick them! Offer them a prize they cannot refuse! Tempt them into fighting a set-piece battle that they think they CAN win! Then slaughter as many of their fighters as possible.
Syria is the bait! The fall of Syria would give them a country, a front-line against Israel, and weaken Iran. It could lead to a broader Sunni/Shia war that eliminates their Saudi/GCC leaders, and Turkey. It may even cause WW3, in which their infidel enemies, the US, Russia, and China eliminate each other! The Syrian campaign offers the Sunni resistance opportunities that are almost too good to be true. And that’s because it is! The Sunni have taken the bait and accepted a fixed battle which pits their lightly armed fighters against a heavily armed and motivated Syrian army. They believe that a distracted NATO will support them with airstrikes, as they did in Libya. It is a trap! They will be killed in their tens of thousands, whilst they wait in vain for NATO air-support. This is the Syrian Mincer!
The Russians are “in” on this ruse! Their UN veto will be used as the excuse the US needs to keep their promised air-support grounded! Russia will keep the Syrians supplied with the weapons needed to kill the Sunni. And the poor Syrians will thank them, unaware that the Russian “stray dog” has chosen their country as the killing ground.
The disputes between Russia and the US are an elaborate part of this fraud! They collude together in Afghanistan, train together in Arizona, but claim to be on the verge of WW3 in Syria! The threat of an Israeli attack on Iran is also a fraud, to make-believe that the Zionist priorities have changed. There are no Iranian nukes, and any strike by a weakened US will lead to disaster! Even their advisors admit to this. It’s all a fake, part of the plan to de-fang a rampant Sunni, who are the real threat to the Old World Order.
So sit back and watch The Mincer at work! There will be no grand “false-flag” attack to justify an attack on Iran, no NATO airstrikes on Syria, only the maintenance of the promise of one, and no WW3! Nothing must be allowed to stop The Mincer from doing its work…eliminating the Sunni “hot-heads” in their jihad! Remember: “By deception, shall we make war!” – MOSSAD!
adrian
August 26, 2012 at 04:54
...
by adrian on 19.10.2012 [15:04 ]
|
|
|
Note: ALL the predictions I made two months ago are correct. These predictions were made with FORESIGHT, based on an understanding of the current conspiracy. All those who predicted Assads fall, war with Iran, WWIII etc. were WRONG!
|
by Lima-P on 19.10.2012 [17:42 ]
|
|
|
read this with even greater pleasure and understanding than the last time round. Events since August seem to confirm your reading of the situation. Well, one thing no one should expect me to do: shed even a single tear over the massacre of the Wahabis and the Muslim Brothers. As in the past, I refuse to call them Sunnis because that is a term which covers the majority of peace-loving Muslims in the world. But this apart, spot on Adrian, spot on. Carry on the good work.
|
by adrian on 19.10.2012 [20:55 ]
|
|
|
Yes, I accept that I have used a broad categorization of the the complex Sunni position - for the sake of simplicity. Wahabi and MB is correct.
The leaders of Saudi and GCC are Western proxy governments, that much is absolutely clear now to all. The ordinary Jihadi have been deceived into fighting a false jihad. They have been betrayed by their own! Watch as they try to retreat - their path will be blocked by Turkish, Jordanian, and NATO forces along the borders. The massacre will continue...
|
by adrian on 19.10.2012 [21:03 ]
|
|
|
If Gods warriors insist on making pacts with the Great Satan, don't be suprised if you get a swift kick up the Assad!
|
by adrian on 20.10.2012 [22:55 ]
|
|
|
Theirry Meyssan writes in "NATO packs it in; Turkey on the Verge of a Nervous Breakdown." (16/10/12):
"on six succesive occasions, the NATO command...gave jihadists instuctions to regroup...in each (they) were easily encircled and wiped out...ANOTHER HYPOTHESIS MUST BE CONSIDERED: THAT NATO IS WILLINGLY SENDING THOSE COMBATANTS TO THEIR DEATHS." (Emphasis mine.)
Now why would NATO want to do a thing like that???
|
by Lima-P on 21.10.2012 [07:43 ]
|
|
|
into the mincer theory was met by much incomprehension on our part. Time seems to have vindicated your approach. And even Thierry Meyssan has swung round to your point of view at long last. So congratulations. Also congratulations for the piece on ICH.
Hope you'll use those fine brains of yours on other matters as well as we go along. We do need people with the visionary touch among the bloggers.
As for no WWIII, we still need further confirmation that it will really not come about. It's all a very touch-and-go situation at present. Though IC, of course, seems to think it's a done deal, Did you listen to Lebanese ex-General Michel Aoun's interview?
|
by adrian on 21.10.2012 [09:53 ]
|
|
|
Thierry Meyssan makes another important point in his article, about Jihadi aesthetics. They have been groomed to believe that they are fighting a religious war - Armageddon - to encourage them to martyr themselves. Thus, much of the NATO propaganda in the MSM and "alternative" press has been directed towards reinforcing this mindset. The fact that this propaganda has deceived many others was a necessary bi-product of this conspiracy.
Of course WWIII is still a real possibility. So is an attack on Iran. When I wrote the piece it seemed immanent. (That's what I contested.) But I think we can postpone it till the Spring at the earliest. The FSA will not exist by then, however.
What this actually means is that Obama and Clinton are shrewd operators. Few Americans have died in this war, yet the number of dead Jihadi is astonishing. Would Romney have been able to pull this off? I doubt it! The neo-Cons are driven by a flawed ideology. Obama sees reality! The Jihadi better watch out!
P.S. From one cyberwarrior to another, does this get me promotion to Arm Chair General?
|
by quantum2012 on 21.10.2012 [12:56 ]
|
|
|
Nice one, Adrian. We need also links to articles, websites, etc. to convince the non-believers that the whole Salafi-jihadi-Wahhabi axis is being organised, orchestrated and generally engineered by intel agencies of certain relevant countries.
Like all good schemes, this one in particular meets multiple objectives simultaneously: controlled chaos in the service of geopolitical objectives; demonization of Islam and Muslims; population reduction, including reduction of useful (but sincere) idiots, responding to "imams" who are really in the services of said intel agencies.
Please do let us know.
Lima-P: missed that interview with Aoun - links, please?
|
by Lima-P on 21.10.2012 [16:36 ]
|
|
|
you lead the next time, instead of haring in the opposite direction. BTW: me too, I liked Meyssan's use of the word "aesthetic" to describe the driving force behind the thuggish activities of the FSA. To use the word Jihad in this connection is totally to misunderstand the meaning of that concept.
Hello quantum2012. The requested link:
h ttp://surferjoe202020.blogspot.ch/2012/10/war-in-syria-will-lead-to-new-world.html
And here's the short intro preceding it:
Arab Hell ~ War in Syria Will Lead to New World Order
Lebanese former military commander-in-chief, Michel Aoun, is interviewed by Syrian State TV on Oct 11, 2012. During the interview, Aoun gives his opinion on the conflict in Syria. He says that the Syrian government will not be toppled, and that this war will put an end to the rise of Islamic extremism in the Arab world. He also believes that a New World Order will emerge as a result of the Syrian conflict, stating that World War III will most likely occur if the ongoing attack against Syria runs out of fuel without it leading to the toppling of its government.
|
by adrian on 22.10.2012 [00:20 ]
|
|
|
You're one of those people, like @AntiZio, who can see the conspiracy clearly. Is that because you undertand the Zionist connection between the FUKUS and Russia?
I laughed when the idea first arose, but then started to see the paradigm shift everywhere. When I first ran a draft copy the reaction of others was hostile, at first. Then most saw the utility of the idea and gave it a more favourable reading.
Now, two months later, the predictions I made with fore-sight appear to have materialised. (No airstikes, limited supply of heavy weapons, lots of hot air to keep the pot boiling, and thousands of dead jihadi.) Many of the current comments on ICH are in that denial stage, but they'll get used to it!
As to posting more info., YIKES!, its not really one of my strengths, others here are far better at it - but I'll try. Any help greatly appreciated.
|
by adrian on 22.10.2012 [00:32 ]
|
|
|
I was thinking about posting an article "Return of the Old World Order" (The NWO having died in Iraq and Afghanistan.) It would embed the Syrian Mincer in its proper geopolitical context. It may take a few days due to work commitments, and my attention being focused on ICH. We'll see...
|
by quantum2012 on 22.10.2012 [16:19 ]
|
|
|
The conspiracy is very easy to understand if you connect the dots:
- Deception is the key to the success of the Zios, so trust nothing without thinking about and investigating the motives of those behind it
- Islamic eschatology, to use Imran Hosein's terminology, informs us about the present "end" times and the strategies of the players
- Both alternative media and MSM do contain some elements of truth, and you only need to learn to separate the wheat from the chaff
BTW, great acronym FUKUS - thanks to Timothy Bancroft-Hinchley. Although it probably needs to be updated to IFUKU (Israel, France, UK, US) to more accurately reflect the key Zio players involved !
|
by Lima-P on 23.10.2012 [09:43 ]
|
|
|
Here's a sentence out of an article posted today talking about Erdogan's agreement to let Bashar al-Assad stay on in Syria. Generous of him, indeed, I'd say,`wouldn't you?
The sentence goes: "On the Syrian issue, the source added that “Washington has authorized Turkey with the field and logistics management, a Saudi Arabia and Qatar provide fund, arms, and Islamist fighters whom the US and its allies want to evacuate from the Gulf and the new ally regimes. So, they either succeed in overthrowing the Syrian regime, and this is a success for this group, or it gets rid of them in Syria where they are used as firewood there, and this is also a success.”
So first Thierry Meyssan and now Al Manar back you up. As for your future writing plans. we're all in favour of your return of the old world order. May time and inspiration both be at there at the appointed time.
I think quantum's witty reworking of the FUkUS acronym is very much to the point. Thanks for that.
|
by adrian on 23.10.2012 [22:45 ]
|
|
|
Excellent!
|
by end_of_the_age_of_parasites on 04.02.2013 [21:23 ]
|
|
|
Your assessment is good and I agree with it based on my research on the end time prophesy. I am trying to see the future through the prophesy and I have found your article a surprise. In this battle many sunni Arab will die, they will be few in number in the end but these people do not bow down to any one except Allah.
But the occupation force will also die in a large number ,although they have planned good but this will backfire on them in the end. Asymmetrical war by the Mujaheddin who are ready to die are a tough nut to crack and all those modern weapon will have no effect against the light cavalry of the Mujaheddin. I have no doubt in my mind that at the end the occupation force will use Nuke as they will be frustrated against the Mujaheddin tactics.
|
by end_of_the_age_of_parasites on 04.02.2013 [21:27 ]
|
|
|
Prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him)said "Matters will run their course until you become three armies:an army in AshSham (Syria) an army in Iraq and an army in the Yemen" The narrator Abdullah ibn Hawalah asked:which one I should join? "He said"You should go to AshSham for it is the best of Allah's lands and the best of His servants will be drawn to there. If you do not, go to the Yemen and drink from its wells.For Allah has guaranteed me that He will look after AshSham and its people"(Abu Dawud)
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
