|
|
American Nuclear Threats and North Korea's Counter Strategy
By: Hahn Ho-suk on: 13.06.2005 [04:10 ] (3290 reads)
|
The US-DPRK Relations at the Close of the 20th Century and the Prospect for United Korea at the Dawn of the 21st Century
|
|
(54950 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by Yasis on 13.06.2005 [06:41 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by paul pawlowski on 13.06.2005 [10:55 ]
|
|
|
USA Imperialism will be defeated again if it dares attack North Korea.
North Korea is not imposing its system on others — leave NK in Peace.
Pyongyang is waiting for Regime Change in Washington — quite right.
The People of the World agree with NK that there should be Regime Change in USA.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 13.06.2005 [12:47 ]
|
|
|
Which would you prefer?
1) US and North Korea go to war - result. hundreds of thousands dead (if not millions)
2) Bush is a coward
|
by BERNIE on 13.06.2005 [13:14 ]
|
|
|
WOW: My eyes were really opened up with this
article. Thanks alot IRAQ WAR, and HAHN HO-SUK.
|
by Atreides on 13.06.2005 [13:29 ]
|
|
|
"2) Bush is a coward"
That isn't really a choice, i think thats a fact. :)
To be serious, I don't really want a war on the Korean peninsula. I'm well aware of the cost of such a war.
Assuming that the US can't win this war and assuming that the outcome will eliminate the reason for a continued US presence in Asia (assuming that the US will have little appetite to immediately move on against china), i think the US is going to loose it's "superpower status" and it's foothold in asia in that war. It will change the geopolitical map.
The question is, is that worth so much destruction?
Honestly, i'm not prepared to answer this, but i think we will see a lot more destruction and dead until we (the world) will look in horror on what we have done and try to find other ways to solve problems, other than with weapons. In my view, the (current) US is an obstacle to this and has to go and a war in Korea probably is still the cheapest way to do that.
|
by Yasis on 13.06.2005 [14:54 ]
|
|
|
Of course I do not want war. I want both North and South to be reunited and the US military to get the hell out of Korea and Japan(and my country).
|
by Yasis on 13.06.2005 [14:58 ]
|
|
|
"In June 1976, the United Stated began Team Spirit military exercises aimed at waging nuclear war on North Korea."
And who was the US secretary of defence during 1976? Donald Rumsfeld.
|
by kamau on 16.06.2005 [03:25 ]
|
|
|
,,,yes, South Africa had nuclear weapons, but they mysteriously ended up in Australia upon the demise of Aparthied. You know full well that white western nations will NOT let Black Africans have nuclear weapons - especially since they came from the hands of their cousins.
|
by Yasis on 16.06.2005 [03:54 ]
|
|
|
Nukes in Australia? Where you get that kamau?
|
by srang14 on 16.06.2005 [07:57 ]
|
|
|
Brilliant analysis. but the author should know that India first cariied out its nuclear tests on May 18,1974 in the Popkharan desert. This was prompted after U S moved its USS Enterprise carrier group in December 1971. It is a matter of history that the U S administration led by Nixon bnlinked first.
The second series of nuclear tests was on May 12 and May 13. These were thermonuclear tests. Nobody knows how many weapons India has.
What is now clear is that Indians have thermo nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them essentially for second strike purposes.
Finally there were no Russian help in these developments. Russian help or precisely Soveit help was confined only to supply of fuel for the Tarapur nuclear reactor, built on Canadian designs. But even that is no longer available. So the essential compulsions of both North Korea and India are the same. Withstand U S led Imperialism and serve as a warning to the U S that jingoism comes with a certain price tag. If you take me, I take you also down with me!
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
