|
|
U.S. Classified Document Describes White Phosphorous As Chemical Weapon
By: KamikazeToyota on: 20.11.2005 [17:39 ] (3338 reads)
|
PRESIDENT SADDAM HUSSEIN ? MAY HAVE POSSIBLY USED WHITE
PHOSPHOROUS (WP) CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST KURDISH REBELS AND THE
POPULACE IN ERBIL (GEOCOORD:3412N/04401E) (VICINITY OF IRANIAN
BORDER) AND DOHUK (GEOCOORD:3652N/04301E) (VICINITY OF IRAQI
BORDER) PROVINCES, IRAQ. |
|
(5563 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [13:57 ]
|
|
|
Thank you again for providing an all-important document.
BTW, I’m sure there are a lot of journalists who would love to have this piece on their hands. I seriously suggest that you pass it for example to uruknet.info or globalresearch.ca.
|
by verve on 21.11.2005 [14:41 ]
|
|
|
Col Boylin on CBC last night, he'd say, "yeh, well, we make the rules so go stuff yerself."
The bastard didn't give a rats ass how many Iraqis, innocent or otherwise, that got fried with WP.
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [15:49 ]
|
|
|
If we don’t limit ourselves to the Iraq war, but have a look at the ‘War on Terror’ (or ‘Error’), it’s plain and clear that U.S. has lost ‘the hearts and minds’ of the entire world. On such circs their defeat is inevitable.
From this point of view Col Boylin (and monsters like him) haven’t grasped the issue yet: they do not make the rules anymore, as they don’t have the initiative. Things are just happening for the Coalition of Kill, and one of the things to happen is that they will be trialed and sentenced for their deeds. Like Nazis. They are shitting to their pants. Like Nazis.
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [20:23 ]
|
|
|
It’s already in www.thecatsdream.com/blog/2005/11/de-classified-report-from-us.htm and also circulating around.
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [21:50 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.nytimes.com/2005/11/21/international/21phosphorus.html&OP=2b52c02eQ2F.....(too long)
note by Xuma: use notlong.com to shorten URLs and avoid breaking the format of the pages here, your link now is:
mobpolia.notlong.com/
but this one works just as well:
www.nytimes.com/2005/11/21/international/21phosphorus.html?pagewanted=print
COMMENT (by jouna): Well, NYTimes hasn’t shown any sprinter qualities either, has it? (cf. www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/69499 with the article ‘AN EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH THE NEW YORK TIMES’ and www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/70631 plus www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/69814).
|
by Seele on 21.11.2005 [22:07 ]
|
|
|
@Mod
I think these above documents absolutely needs to be upgraded to HOT NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don t you think so ???
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [23:14 ]
|
|
|
The article by K-T and G.Z. is now available on uruknet.info/?p=m18057, too.
@ Seele: nice to see you. I‘ve been away for awhile, and noticed that you hit the golden cord in your ‘US military again hides its casualty figure ?’ (www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/70700). This topic should be never forgotten, since the individual able to dig out, prove and establish the real casualty figure will simply force the U.S. withdrawal in no time. Stay on Target, mates :)
@ mods & eds: I agree with Seele and so does Gabriele (Zamparini). There’s some action around this very soon. Hint: I’m seeing that the ultimate article is on it’s way, so it might be advisable to lay low for awhile and wait :) A chat with Gabriele won’t do you any harm either...
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [23:19 ]
|
|
|
LINK: thinkprogress.org/2005/11/21/phosphorus-chemical/
(Already found by google search ‘chemical weapons’.)
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [23:33 ]
|
|
|
We’re in good hands here: today I wrote to moderator049 as follows:
“There is now a HIGHLY RELEVANT article “U.S. Classified Document Describes White Phosphorous As Chemical Weapon” (By KamikazeToyota) in www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/70779. If confirmed this is the ‘missing link‘ on the WMD issue in Iraq, since this basically confirms that the U.S. CONSIDERS WP as Chemical Weapon.
It is possible to break through from here and make the U.S. double standards collapse on the WMD issue once for all. Once the WMD issue is beyond denying, it is possible to strenghten the case with the poison gas and depleted uranium (both in Iraq and in the U.S.-U.K. past). It is my opinion that this direction should be explored with every possible means, using all contacts and all journalists available.
As I may be away for awile I might not be able to push forth on these lines personally, so I left a comment about this (under the article), but as I wasn’t sure KamikazeToyota gets it, I leaked the link for Gabriele Zamparini and now urge you, too).”
As mentioned, I also passed the information to G.Z. who “wanted the info to circulate as fast as possible.” According to him “This story must go on!!!” which he personally is taking care now.”
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [23:46 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051121/NEWS06/511210410/1012
NOTE: This is a propaganda piece, but perhaps you should have a look for it’s really discraceful straight from the headline to bottom.
|
by jouna on 21.11.2005 [23:53 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.brusselstribunal.org/WMD.htm#white.
(It’s quite comprehensive and you should make yourselves acquaint with it).
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [01:56 ]
|
|
|
Why is the right edge of this article so far away?
Could you check and fix it?
Thanks.
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [02:39 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.uruknet.info/?p=m18073
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [02:57 ]
|
|
|
LINK: uruknet.info/?p=m18075
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [03:01 ]
|
|
|
A related discussion in www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/69499.
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [03:10 ]
|
|
|
“It is feared that thousands of bomblets lie unexploded in Iraq, capable of maiming or killing innocent civilians. This week, more than two years after they were dropped, Britain is finally being held to account”
LINK: uruknet.info/?p=m18071.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 22.11.2005 [03:59 ]
|
|
|
I've recently been had comminications from a friend. One topic mentioned people with energy. You are absolutely bursting with it. Unfortunately I cant keep up with the fantsatic myrriad of links you come up with, but still, keep up the good work.
Can I offer a suggestion that where possible, you put as many link's in one post? It will be easier for me to store and help with the 'flow' of the thread and to post my long musings and autoerotic mental fondlings.
Cheers
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 22.11.2005 [04:10 ]
|
|
|
1 more thing...
I'd like to offer many thanks to KamikazeToyota for posting this superb information here. The net closes in on the bastatrds a bit more. Trouble is, they are are so slippery that they often manage to wriggle free of it.
In addition, to what I say in the related article:
- iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/70815 "Tim Collins trained troops to fight with white phosphorus"
I should add that in the hands of the opposnents of the USUK Coalition of the Killing then, white phosphorus is a chemical weapon. In the USUK coalitions's hands it has legitimate use.
The duplicity is astounding.
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 22.11.2005 [04:12 ]
|
|
|
The reason why this page is 'stretched' is becasue the URL you posted above is very long and is treated as a continuous test stream (which it is).
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [04:50 ]
|
|
|
1. I’ve started it already, but in such cases I want to be sure, that all of them really belong together. To achieve this I add them directly to the first article. There should be two of them coming in soon (on ‘Syria’ and ‘Arab League’), so look at them carefully.
2. Usually (like above) updates are not necessarily directly connected (e.g. the tree items UPDATE: ‘Spinning the News: Fallujah’, BACKROUND (inside iraq-war.ru) and RELATED: ‘UK's deadly legacy: the cluster bomb’. All of them are of different status, and the middle one is not directly about the WMD issue, so I give them as a separate entries hoping my preliminary distinctions will help the editors rearranging them.
3. Thanks for the explanation for ‘stretched’ page.
BTW: I prefer open (written) links passim, since sometimes you can gather from this whether the newswire is worth reading at all. For example, seeing it’s BBC “nows” makes you doubt whether it’s worth of checking at all. And so on...
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 22.11.2005 [09:40 ]
|
|
|
Lets put it there.
al-Zarqawi will have other opportunities to be 'Hot News' the next time he dies.
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [18:13 ]
|
|
|
LINK: www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/22/1515228
|
by jouna on 22.11.2005 [18:18 ]
|
|
|
“As reports finally surface about the use of white phosphorous in Iraq, David Miller explains how the mainstream media has failed.”
LINK: www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php?article_id=7862
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 23.11.2005 [13:53 ]
|
|
|
First the US government denied using white phosphorous at all.
Then they said that they used it, but only for illumination.
Then they admitted that they used it in combat, but that it was not a chemical weapon.
Now they've been caught calling it a chemical weapon themselves.
I wonder what their next excuse will be?
|
by Iranian-Shi'ite on 23.11.2005 [13:56 ]
|
|
|
USA: "Ok, we admit having used white phosphorous in combat; and we admit that it is a chemical weapon. But it is the legal kind of chemical weapon, not the illegal kind of chemical weapon."
I predict that line or something like it will resemble their next excuse.
|
by jouna on 23.11.2005 [14:18 ]
|
|
|
I gave a little boost to the newswire by KamikazeToyota, and this discussion is now continued in the article ‘A War Crime Within A War Crime Within A War Crime’
LINK: www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/70982
PUNCH: “The question has now widened: is there any crime the coalition forces have not committed in Iraq?”
See you there :)
|
by Mike-Malaysia on 24.11.2005 [08:29 ]
|
|
|
Sadly, kindered spirt, Having seen the nature of the beast over many years, I'd have to answer that question with a "no"
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
