|
|
The night before the bombing: Two eyewitnesses
By: roadstoiraq.com on: 24.02.2006 [09:44 ] (5094 reads)
|
(2485 bytes) [nc]
|
|
« “Freedom of Speach”: Movies“Freedom of Speach”: revisionists and videos »
The night before the bombing: Two eyewitnesses
Update: There was one small mistake in the translation, the time line says 6,41 should be 6,45, that’s all.
The picture above shows Sunnis in Samarra demonstrating and condemning the bombing of the “Golden Dome”, the Imam in picture is a Sunni imam, you can tell from his white turban, Shiia imams wear a black turban.
I want the readers to know that for Samarra inhabitants, the mosques doesn’t represents a Shiia shrines only but represents the existence of the city also and they are very proud of them, even when the situation went very bad between Sunni and Shiia, Shiia pilgrimages to city never attacked by any group, it’s kind of unwritten code of honor.
Testimonies of two eyewitnesses near the bombed Dome:
Witness 1:
I live in a district very near to the mosque and I will tell you exactly what I saw hours before the bombing.
There is a daily curfew in our city (Samarra) starts from 8,00 in the evening until 6,00 in the morning, in the night before the bombing and just when it’s getting dark there was unusual activities by the ING in the area around the mosque, I heard their cars the whole night until next day in the morning.
The Mosque Guards testimony says: Four people with ING uniforms blind folded them and set the bombs.
The witness continues, so ask I you how could the terrorists enter the area which is usually surrounded by the ING and enter the mosque then runway without being got by the police?.
Witness 2:
Witness 2 gives more detailed information and the Americans connection to the events before the bombing, so I made it as timeline of the events.
My name is Muhammad Al-Samarrai, I own an internet-cafe near the mosque, I sleep in my shop because I am worry about my computers from thieves.
8,30 (evening) joint forces of Iraqi ING and Americans asked me to stay in the shop and don’t leave the area.
9,00 (evening) they left the area.
11,00 (evening) they came back and started to patrol the area until the morning.
6,00 (next day morning) ING leave the area .
6,30 Americans leave the area .
6,40 first explosion.
6,45 second explosion.
He confirmed again that the curfew starts at 8,00 (evening) until next day 6,00 (morning), INGs and the Americans will surround and patrol the city all that time.
http://www.roadstoiraq.com/?p=723
by stоpwar on 24.02.2006 [09:51 ]
|
|
|
the destruction of a beautiful holy building. Would British Catholics cheer if the dome of St Paul's Cathedral was destroyed?
This cannot be the work of sincere muslims of any denomination.
|
by EnglishWorkingclassDissident. on 24.02.2006 [10:51 ]
|
|
|
Would Catholics cheer?........I believe the time frame would be significant on that answer stopwar, England during the reformation were BEHEADING Catholics hmmmm.
|
by hellsbells on 24.02.2006 [11:06 ]
|
|
|
Any proof that the wearers of ING uniforms were Iraqis?
That timeline very definitely points to deliberate destruction of the dome by military experts overseen by yankees.
I hope all Iraqis understand the significance of these eyewitnesses' statements.
|
by makarov on 24.02.2006 [11:11 ]
|
|
|
Although, US has already taken responsibility for this act of terror by the statement that "Al-Qaeda" might have commited it.
Everybody knows that "Al-Qaeda" (R), "Osama bin Laden" (R), & "Al-Zarqawi" (R) are the CIA owned brands.
|
by stоpwar on 24.02.2006 [11:16 ]
|
|
|
I take your point - they even beheaded Sir Walter Raleigh! But the Catholics, under King James I "occupation" tried to blow up Parliament, not religious buildings. Only Henry VIII was monstrous enough to do a thing like that. And we know now that he had been driven mad by syphilis.
Taking this as a parallel - the resistance would be going for the green zone, not the mosques. And that is what has been happening since the start of the occupation.
|
by stоpwar on 24.02.2006 [11:19 ]
|
|
|
Tony Blair uttered almost those same words regarding 7/7 - only two hours after the last explosion (the bus) had taken place.
|
by Morgane on 24.02.2006 [11:59 ]
|
|
|
Unless...unless they are Kurds? We all know well that Kurds want their own state and a break-up and loss of power to other Iraqis.
Sorry to ask - but did Kurds do this? We know that Israelis are well-entrenched in the North and are supporting the Kurds - did they organize this? (Stupid question - when Mossad/Zionists/Israel are concerned!)
|
by Morgane on 24.02.2006 [12:14 ]
|
|
|
Is this part of the great plan to "soften up" the region for the Zionist-US destruction of the Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque in Palestine?
Of course, the Israeli state will stop at nothing to realise its vision of a "Greater Israel" and delights in any move that causes chaos and strife in the region it so greatly covets ("from the Euphrates to the river of Egypt") and actually believes it owns!
|
by EnglishWorkingclassDissident. on 24.02.2006 [13:02 ]
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly.
|
by pdove on 24.02.2006 [14:04 ]
|
|
|
This is incredible - TWO different stories about the same 47 people being gunned down from ABC news. One must ask - who changed the story, and why? What is the only entity in America that can influence the news this way?
It appears that STORY No. 1 would make the US Army or Iraqis look bad - since they operate the checkpoints.
Here's the second version which was posted on go.com early afternoon on 2/23/06. Note how the civilians are being blamed in this story. All references to a checkpoint have been removed.
Please see ref:www.rense.com/general69/twotot.htm
It clearly show the slippage on the truth of the atrocity.
|
by Morgane on 24.02.2006 [15:36 ]
|
|
|
I agree. On one BBC Channel they were blaming Iraqi Sunnis, and on the other they were blaming Al-Qaeda - while yet another commentator blamed Saddam! All of it with know-all authority of course as if anybody who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
The fact is, nobody on the BBC has a CLUE about Iraq. None of their reporters can speak a word of Arabic (you can easily recognise this because they constantly and irritatingly mispronounce Arabic names - e.g. they just don't know that for names which begin with s d or r etc you don't pronounce the 'l' in 'al' - and it sounds extremely odd and unpleasant - and insulting - to hear it) and of course the reporters never ever go out and speak to ordinary Iraqis.
The same with the army - they know diddly-squat about the country they are lounging about in, setting up checkpoints and ordering the locals around - and criticising them too as if anyone who doesn't speak English and act like a idiot Englishman is dumb. The arrogance of it! It truly makes me cringe.
Tony Blair says he will "help" mend the mosque. Sounds a bit previous doesn't it? Did he have the idea already waiting to say as soon as the (planned) destruction took place?
|
by paul pawlowski on 24.02.2006 [17:02 ]
|
|
|
How?
Man on BBC this morning was saying Iraq was exporting 2 million barrels per day.
Washington believed Iraq could increase output to five million per day.
Today Iraq is exporting one million per day.
Yes — Iraqi give Bush Blair five million per day and Bush Blair will rebuid their beautiful mosque. Drain Iraq dry — Iraqi Red Indian.
|
by foomagoo on 24.02.2006 [17:29 ]
|
|
|
I love the lies this web site spreads. Its great! It's just like the bush regime except in the other direction. You all act as if terrist can't dress in uniforms. Muslims would do this. They've been doing this sort of thing for centuries. They stone people for dancing. Come on!!
|
by foomagoo on 24.02.2006 [17:31 ]
|
|
|
Not all muslims would do this. But there are some muslims that would. They shout everyday that killing and bombing is okay if it furthers their cause. This furthers their cause which is getting the Americans out of Iraq.
|
by BigPearl on 24.02.2006 [17:35 ]
|
|
|
perhaps someday the Muslims will learn how 2 act.
|
by sjreese on 24.02.2006 [19:56 ]
|
|
|
"I do want to begin with an update on our Vice President, Dick Cheney. He didn't shoot anyone else, but his whereabouts on the night in question is unknown between 6:30 to 7:00 pm Baghdad time is all a blur and he is a man with the finger on the button." --Jon Stewart
|
by axeman on 24.02.2006 [20:57 ]
|
|
|
that Jad has briefed most of the Shia clerics as to the real perpetrators of this terrible act of terrorist outrage! No doubt he has told them that American, Jizraeli and UK pigs were behind it in order to divide the Iraqi people before the attack on Iran takes place as they know that most Shia would rise against the illegal occupiers otherwise. A desperate move by the Zionshits reveal a troubling future for them! Hastiness is indeed from satan the accursed!!
|
by cosmo on 24.02.2006 [23:09 ]
|
|
|
Cancer normally has to be removed and the fact that some groups have energies that function into certain directions is nothing that one can control, it becomes a self sustaining process of self destruction.!!!
All they have to do is just PUSH THE BUTTON.!!
|
by turco on 25.02.2006 [02:29 ]
|
|
|
Muslims would do this. They've been doing this sort of thing for centuries. They stone people for dancing. Come on!!
I guess you mean sunnis.
They could of course. But they did not for hundreds of yrs.
Why would they do it today?
so that US can attack Iran while shia and sunnis are killing eachother?
|
by turco on 25.02.2006 [03:04 ]
|
|
|
Let's hope they give messages of peace and not of revenge.
|
by spartacus11 on 25.02.2006 [06:17 ]
|
|
|
May backfire. Iraqis are not stupid, The friday prayers demonstrated that. The shia and sunnis untied. Those who are killing civilians according to reports from all the media including the MSM are dressed in police uniform, therefore spies and traitors and collaboratos working for the ZioUSAN army are behind it, and Iraqis know all this perfectly well.
The most intresting thing is FOX News yesterday had an ex military guest who was talking if the violence errupts than maybe we should plan about a hasty withdraw, sort of the Vietnam type.
So all this could be just an USAn excuse to get out of Iraq, and save some face.
|
by hungry-ghost on 25.02.2006 [09:35 ]
|
|
|
"Campaign to Abolish X-mas celebration by gentiles . . . according to the known Jewish ruling that Christians are idol worshippers. (Likkutei Sichos 37:198)"
So Christians or non-Christian Gentiles, according to the "Rambam Mishne Torah" should be lashed, punished, and put to death if they insist on following their own religious practices, including celebration of non-Jewish religious holidays, such as Christmas.
Hey hey what are fighting for...the 'REAL' enemy is laughing and making goy killing each other..
JOIN THE US MARINES AND DIE FOR ISRAEL
www.public-action.com/christmas.html
www.iamthewitness.com
|
by stоpwar on 25.02.2006 [14:09 ]
|
|
|
I brought this to everyone's attention during Christmas 2005. Quite clear from media reports that Christmas celebration is about "Father Christmas" and not the birth of Jesus.
As an illustration, there were pictures of Gallilee - and people lining the streets wearing Santa Claus costumes. Probably as posed as the "dethronement of Saddam" in Baghdad. But most people seem obvilious to the misleading use of the TV shot.
Even though I'm no longer a Christian, this ominous development worries me greatly.
|
by verve on 25.02.2006 [15:05 ]
|
|
|
other that xmas, is such a roaring 'commercial' success? Ban xmas? Yeh, the planet will heave a sign of relief.
if you wanna go to church, fill yer boots, but christmas is a fucking abomination, period.
|
by verve on 25.02.2006 [15:08 ]
|
|
|
christmas 'celebrations' do they want to stop people from going to church and praying? No. There's a difference. Besides, Jesus was a jew, what's to celebrate?
|
by Nick_UK on 25.02.2006 [16:08 ]
|
|
|
If Muslims in Iraq would rather tear each other to pieces than fight the Jewish-Zionist war machine that is raping their country, then there really is no hope for the country. This is a pefect opportunity for the Shia to launch a rebellion and unite with their Sunni brothers to destroy the Ameroisraelis once and for all. If there are any Iraqi Shia out there, tell me this? Would you rather be ruled by Iraqi Baathists or AmeroIsraeli Zionists? At the moment, apart from the great Muqtada, it seems you prefer the latter option.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
