|
|
Who is running America?
By: Barefoot's World on: 19.08.2004 [10:46 ] (2592 reads)
|
(23452 bytes) [nc]
|
|
Temporary offline
by Truth Seeker Guest on 19.08.2004 [14:27 ]
|
|
|
Choosen extracts from the book "Banking On The World - The Politics Of American Finance" by J.Frieden published by Harper & Row in New York, 1987 :
...International finance is the pivot around which the world economy twists and turns and it affects politics and economics in every nation...
...The effects of global banking are both economic and political, and they are felt both in relations between nations and inside the nations themselves...
...Many of the country's leading financial houses first achieved recognition as conduits for the foreign capital that the develloping United States was sucking in. August Belmont was the Rothschild representative in America, Morgan, Kidder, Peabody, Brown Brothers, J. and W. Seligman, and Kuhn, Loeb functionned primarily as channels to draw loans into the United States from the world's financial centers in London, Paris and Hamburg...
...The firm of Kuhn, Loeb and the National City Bank, in concert with British and German partners lent $410 millions to Japan during the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905. Jacob Schiff - head of Kuhn, Loeb, America's leading Jewish investment bank was especially pleased to assist the Japanese war against the anti-Semitic "enemy of mankind" sitting in St Petersburg. The British government itself borrowed some $200 millions from the firms of both Morgan and Kidder, Peabody between 1900 and 1902 to help finance the expensive Boer War....
...World War I put American international bankers at the center of world politics, and they faced the aftermath of World War I with great enthusiasm...
...The nation's international financiers, though, saw clearly the course they wanted to follow. The time had come for America "to seize and and hold her rightful heritage - the material and moral leadership in world affairs", in the words of New York financier A. J. Rosenthal...
...Despite their great domestic and international economic strength. indeed, most of the' international bankers' ideas and interests were on the fringes of the American political system in the 1920's. International bankers were, after all, a breed quite apart from most Americans, and even from most American business people; they were likely to know Austria far better than Arkansas. Many of their political initiatives expressed an almost missionary zeal about issues few americans knew or cared anything about...
...Thomas Lamont, a close friend of Lippmann's was an early and fervent opponent of American hostility to Lenin's revolutionnary regime in Russia...
...More generally. American international bankers were world travelling sophisticates with little but contempt for the average government and politician...
..."My special job is more fun than being King, Pope or Prime Minister anywhere for no one can turn me out of it and I don't have to make compromises with principles."...
..."'I feel it is the highest compliment to compare Morgan's to the Foreign Office. They regard it as an insult to suggest that they have any connection with the Government; or any Government."...
...In the 1930's and 1940's, Americans international financiers redoubled their efforts to lead the United States toward a course of action they deemed appropriate...
...By 1935, the Roosevelt was edging toward economic internationalism. Ten years later, when the United States got a second chance to rebuild a war-shattered Europe, bankers helped make sure that neither Congress nor the public would stand in the way of a financial Pax Americana...
...On the, eve of World War II there could be no doubt that the Roosevelt administration would be a hospitable place for those concerned with international economic and financial reconstruction...
...As war begun in Europe, Wall Street's economic internationalists flooded into the Roosevelt administration to plan for the postwar economic settlement. Some of the country's most prominent wartime and postwar figures came to government from the financial community...
...Much of the powerfull cohort of wartime and postwar Ieaders who would rebuild the world after 1945 came from Wall Street...
...The bankers were able to get much of what they wanted in postwar reconstruction...
...With Europe currencies freed, with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund trustworthy and active, and with trade' liberalization and European integration, America's international bankers faced a friendly world...
...In the early 1960's, international finance took an unprecedented turn toward what came to be known as the offshore markets or Euromarkets. Soon hundreds of billions of dollars were flowing untramelled across borders with a speed and fluidity that, even America's most optimistic international bankers could not have imagined in the 1930's and 1940's. On the basis of the postwar economy that American planners designed, international bankers brought together the largest and most mobile pool of capital in world history...
...Soon London's bankers invented a new international financial concept : Eurocurrency or offshore currency deposits, defined as currency held outside its country of issue - for example, dollars in London or Swiss francs in Luxemburg. Regulatory responsability was confused from the start, since there was little precedent for a country to control the use of its currency outside its borders. To take the most common case, Eurodollars in London, the American government could hardly claim authority over banks in Great Britain, even if they were using dollars, while British authorities had no reason to regulate the use of another country's' currency so long as the transactions did not leak directly into the British economy. Matters were complicated by the large number of foreign banks' in London, so that the relevant guestion might be, Who was going to supervise dollar deposits in a German bank's branches on British soil ? The answer came quickly enough : nobody...
...Every major international corporation came to the offshore markets to deposit money and look for 'loans. Big investors, including the increasingly wealthy Arab oil magnates, deposited more and more into the markets, attracted by high interest rates and by what Citibank's Julien-Pierre Koszul in 1970 called "a marvelous platform from which it is easy to rebound, in any direction, to any country, into any currency - and with anonymity."...
...Today's international financial markets constitute a pool of capital of almost unimaginable size. The offshore markets in which most international banking takes place'hold almost $3 trillion...
...This huge pool of capital is not stagnant. In an average year, banks and other investors in the offshore markets lend $300 billions to governments and nonfinancial corporations...
...Banks all over the world are tied electronically to these enormous international financial markets. They can shift millions of dollars around the globe or trade billions of yens for Deutsche marks, in a matter of minutes...
...They can put together billion dollars loans for major governments and multinational corporations in a few days...
...In the early 1960's, international finance integration began to come into conflict with both national security and domestic prosperity...
...In the early 1970's, the offshore banks and bondhoIders lent $35 billion a year. The world's international bankers were lending more in two years than they had in the previous century. With international banks, corporations and private investors dealing in billions of dollars a day, national governments found it too expensive to protect their currencies from speculative attack...
...The international banking system is in fact eroding the international and domestic, economic and political underpinnings of the postwar world order...
...Today, the Euromarkets tie the world's investors, borrowers and banks together in a network that is at the same time part of no national financial system and part of them all...
...The world's major banks have come together from dozens of countries in a denationalized zone of financial neutrality. This banking twilight zone belongs to no nation, is governed by no country's laws and is subject to little or no regulation...
...This great international financial system is important, both for its size and because it forms the apex of a pyramid whose base is the national economies of the entire capitalist world. The huge financial institutions that dominate the offshore in turn hold sway over the financial markets of their home nation...
...All nations are drawn into the international financial whirlwind. Their economies depend on their domestic financial system, the financial system is led by a' few big banks and these few banks are part of the tightly knit' world of international finance...
...The offshore financial markets contain more capital than has ever been brought together in world history, and they are a major force in the economies of all the world's nations...
...Daily volume on the world's foreign exchange market is now about $200 billion, and the volume is doubling every five years or so...
...Only a tiny fraction of this foreign exchange trading is needed for actual trade in goods - annual world trade is equal to about three weeks of forex activity - and most of it represents lightning movements into and out of currencies in response to small changes in their real or expected values...
...The handfull of banks involved in international lending today may have a far greater potential for self-reinforcing delusions and illusions than millions of scattered bondholders...
...On the Euromarkets, the world's most important banks bring the world most powerfull investors together with the world's leading corporations and governments. Every year, hundreds of billions of dollars in syndicated Eurocurrency, bank credits, Eurobonds and a variety of more exotic financial instruments are made available to borrowers all over the world. As the international banking system move this huge mass of capital from source to use, it can affect the fate of firms. industries and even countries...
...In some ways, the great size and the practical extraterritorialy of the offshore markets allows them virtually to to dictate economic policies to the world's governments...
...The ability of the contemporary international financial systems to shift billions of dollars from place to place in minutes gives the markets something akin to veto power over domestic or international decisions...
...Walter Wriston spoke to me in his Citicorp Center Office :
"There are 60,000-odd terminals out there in the trading rooms of the world, and those guys are about as sentimental as a block of ice, if they are gonna sell, that's it. This is new in the history of the world and I don't think it can be structured or contained and I think that's good news over a long time frame. There's no place to hide."
"At the end of the day, it's a new world and the concept of sovereignty is going to change. Politically, the new world is an integrated market in which nobody can get away with what they used to."
"For the first time in history, the politicians can't stop it. It's beyond the political control of the world, and that's the good news."
"Once you tie the world together with telecomunications and information, the ball game is over."
...Walter Wriston is the most prominent spokeperson for the american international banking community, and there's little doubt that his conscience coincides with his needs...
...Capital now moves across borders in such quantities and at such speed that the ability of national governments to formulate economic policies is seriously circumbscribed...
...No government responds for the actions of international financial markets and national policies are increasingly powerless in the face of a truly global banking system...
...New technologies could only create a worldwide financial system, however, because political forces encouraged and tolerated them. Since World War II, the economic and political leaders of all Western, nations have been generally comited to international economic integration...
...International bankers have powerful and concentrated interests in a financially integrated world economy, since their business is central to such a world...
..."Today," Wriston has said, "except in a very few instances, national borders are no longer defensible against the invasion of knowledge, ideas or financial data. We now have a calculus which, I believe, will in the end be beneficial to the world. It exerts global pressure on all governments to persue sounder economic policies because it is increasingly obvious that it is now impossible to hide in our new electronic world."...
...The economic role of government would be restricted to smoothing the transition of workers and capitalists from uncompetitive to competitive industries or regions, helping to organize markets and providing a sympathetic judicial and social environment for private international transactions...
...Anthony Solomon worried in 1982 that "the pronounced increase in interdependence we have seen has so far done little to dislodge deeply ingrained opinions. Instead, most governments, whether in the industrial countries or in the develloping world still cling to unrealistic notions of national autonomy. It is an illusion that full national freedom of action exist in the world we have, and it is wiser to be honest about that and let go of the illusion."...
...Walter Wriston told me. "As Thomas Jefferson once said, you are not transported to liberty on a featherbed. We are in a revolution right now, and it's being driven by technology. There is nothing the politicians can do - they can play King Canute for a minute, but the political process eventually catches up with technological innovation. That doesn't mean the halcyon days are here or the wonders of world government, but I would argue that it's putting a closer noose in a shorter time frame on the political action of every country."...
...Increasing economic interdependence, Wriston believes, already so restricts the maneuvering room for national politics that it cannot be reversed...
...Since 1980, the U.S. government has become the world's larger international debtor, and the United States as a whole has become a net debtor nation for the first time since World War I...
...If the United States, with the world's largest economy, is whipsawed by international financial trends, the economic and political fortunes of smaller nations can be overturned in a matter of weeks...
|
by Nom DePlume Guest on 19.08.2004 [14:35 ]
|
|
|
I stumbled upon this little document, that bears relevance to the topic, today
By: Stephen Kimbol Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997.
At
the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore
Her
Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security
Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf,
is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is
hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to
redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United
States Law.
Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of
the
Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty
of
Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for
the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers
and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to
there knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a
debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED
STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war.
See
Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King
of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8
Statutes
at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the
repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating
from
February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the
King
money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not
incredible the King funded both sides of the War. But there was more work
that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was
declared
in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted,
monies borrowed,and debts contracted by, or under the authority of
Congress,
before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present
confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United
States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the
public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was
nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they
were not done yet.
Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in
Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under
the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting, but
there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the
following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of
Confederation
On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take
place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of
confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did
the people know that the so called founding fathers were acutely going to
reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the
Constitution.
The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor: In the civil law, one
who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's
debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt
owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not
a
party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote On
August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making
provision
for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S.
Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes
abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look
it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In
this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was
for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This
had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the
debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for
a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to
people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great
Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso
facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional
entity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other
words, a Person.
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this
planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at
law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak
to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.
Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it
states; All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the
Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States
under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section
Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money
on
the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which
went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then
because
the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.
The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States
Bank
in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued
of
which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United
States
money in exchange for Securities of the United States
Now the creditors of the United States which included the King
wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States.
So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol.The
people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax
which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the
Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off
of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell
you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the
floundering
fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a
Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in
court
attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is
because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!! If you don't believe
read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of
Savannah.
14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, no private person has a right
to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the
Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is
not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause
(15) which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the
Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to
provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United
States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their to
collect our substance.
As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military
Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty
of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed on November
19th,
1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states
that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice
King that he was , he decided that the troops would return to England by June
1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the
King wanted them here.
Here is the key to were this started:
Many people tend to blame the Jews for our problems. Jewish Law governs
the
entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY
PRESIDENT
SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:
"Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel.
Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees,
and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire
Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who
adopted
the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the
decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of
Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the
entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the
subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" — A Law of the Jews
Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol
71:
pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are
the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the
Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became
the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code.
The
written credit agreement — the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property
(realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that
the Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are in charge of the
Baking
system.
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is were all of
our problems come from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been
enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is
total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things
that do not exist.
Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry
people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is
true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs.
Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520
You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one)
the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.
Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile
has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell
the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me
and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The
court then says case dismissed. Why ? Because you are not a party to the
contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract
(Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that
you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a
CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why ? Because you are attempting
to
infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make
matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights.
You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of
examples:
"The primary control and custody of infant is with the government"
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62
" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband,
the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual
so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting
to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to
the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st
Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a
slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor.
"The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute
inalienable right, is one which has never existed since governments were
instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v. The
People.
13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS
is not an Agency of the United States Government.
All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By
using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking
series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most
taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is
reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in
6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are
considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes
via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that
is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment
Real
Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of
the
IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the
Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved
Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB
number
1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by
foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.
These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309,
Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for
the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399
reads
U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a
payment of a tax to the U.K. Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the
law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in
there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private
contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section
One. and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the
machine
gets connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow
that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing
that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself.
Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a
small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and
most of all breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other
slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an
extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are
anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don;t want to be a
slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want
to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want bow down and worship
corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not
the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the
want-to-be-slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope
would not even exist, because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter
of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All
the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free
education,
free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them I do agree
that a slave should not have access to a firearm. How can you disagree with
the government passing out birth control ? I hope the breeding of slaves
stops or at the very least slows down.
You see we are cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the
United
States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain
is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the
Pope.
Now to Rome.
"Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to
keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their
princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to
sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may
adopt
with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with
the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers
join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for
them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the
nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being
observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n.
4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being
accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence
the jus nationale,(Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws
prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the
Sovereign
Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown
that the Pope rules the world?
The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of
1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.
I could go on and on, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let
this information scare you because without it you cannot be free, You have
to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your
mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great
Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional
entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your
slavery was because you believed a lie.
For more information: Nicole Terry
630K, Willow Street
Highspire, Pennsylvania 17034
717-986-0239
noslavery@aol.com
|
by KS Guest on 19.08.2004 [18:58 ]
|
|
|
How exactly did the population in US become debtors?? How did they owe King George the money??? He loaned it to them for wars???
I dont quite graps the story here.
And are you saying that the US government bound its peoples to this debt??
regards,.
KS
|
by Truth Seeker Guest on 19.08.2004 [19:42 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by Tet on 19.08.2004 [20:47 ]
|
|
|
I guess this kind of explains why Patick Henry refused to sign the Constitution. Peace.
|
by Nom DePlume Guest on 19.08.2004 [22:00 ]
|
|
|
"And are you saying that the US government bound its peoples to this debt??"
In a sentence, YES, all American men, women, and children are, indeed, born into debt-bondage as soon as a corporate State issued "Birth Certicate" has been signed by the birth parents (without their full knowledge, of course), and become surety-obligator-collatoral for the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, INC's "national debt," owed to the Crown's creditors - whoever they may be.
Read "What's in a Birth Certificate" in the History & Analysis archives to get a better understanding, KS.
|
by deathtomarines Guest on 20.08.2004 [02:01 ]
|
|
|
How the heck are we not supposed to talk about the Jews when they are the cause of the problem.
I like to see all these banks, burn down to dust and let the people rule, dammit!
Somebody ought to blow this banks!
|
by Ensabahnur Guest on 20.08.2004 [02:52 ]
|
|
|
Every "Person" in the U.S was pledged to be the surity of the debt. The labor, resources, and land was all given as surity to the debt, and to bind the people to it the U.S govt had to trick people with Color of Law and convince everyone they were the Artificial-Person on their Birth Certificate.
|
by Ensabahnur Guest on 20.08.2004 [02:56 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by Tet on 20.08.2004 [04:55 ]
|
|
|
Please welcome Ensabahnur to this site. I've read his stuff on another site and I know he'll have a lot to add if he'd care to join us.
|
by Mr Bean Guest on 20.08.2004 [10:40 ]
|
|
|
Welcome to this forum.
This post and thread is extremely important and interesting. Thanks for the information Nom de Plume and other posters. Hmmm, very, very interesting. I think I'll save it on my hard drive. PEACE.
|
by Nom DePlume Guest on 20.08.2004 [12:00 ]
|
|
|
Welcome! Thanks for the excellent resource link.
|
by mocking_bird Guest on 20.08.2004 [15:27 ]
|
|
|
very much surprised, Dr. John Coleman seemingly not mentioned here. it may sound paradoxical, we in Russia are pretty well informed, indeed. but I certainly don't think
"ternational finance is the pivot around which the world economy twists and turns and it affects politics and economics in every nation..."
new ideas are .
|
by Truth Seeker Guest on 20.08.2004 [17:34 ]
|
|
|
I dont understand the meaning of your post. Please be clearer if you want me to answer something coherent. Your post, though short, is a mess.
|
by scipio Guest on 20.08.2004 [19:03 ]
|
|
|
Like I have said all along, the vengeance of the Almighty is the sweetest but it has just begun for now I have returned to Him, his four cardinal winds and the punishment of the unrepentant wicked, it has just begun and what form it will take, I have no clue but I know the creator is faithful to His promises to recompense everyone according to their deeds and so to the powerlusting warmongers suffering from the "Alexander Syndrome" bear this in mind and do so very well..."Ẹ jẹ ki oju yin la ki ẹwa ri wipe pẹlẹbẹ ni ti ọbe"...
Be patient my siblings, those who have stolen from us, who have oppressed and enslaved us, who have disenfranchised and brutalized us, who have orphaned and polluted us, who continue to exhult in wickedness, vainglory, hubris, and egomania, they shall be furiously vengeanced now and as for their cohorts who lust after a thousand pleasures at the detriment of their souls, I weep for them and as for the dark powers behind the global manipulation of governments, the intimidation of the noble, and the corruption of the upright, you know very well Orion, that indeed, your time! It is up!...
Do not tire friends, do not relent, our goal remains the same thus: First we recapture the 'Houses', then we reclaim Jerusalem and after that, we will then know the true terror masters for if their escuses for terror purveyance are no longer existent, what pray, shall they do then?...
And so, to the three armies once again, unleash Truth, pursue Justice, and harvest the Innocents, the misguided, the repentant, and the contrite with Compassion...The final march against the wicked! It begins today and fear nothing for they are the ones trembling now for they know fully well that there's no hiding place for the wicked and the criminals and despotic powerlusters shall find no rest! Least of all, from us the Innocent Youth of Terra for we want neither power, glory, praises, or even wealth, we simply want what is ours and what my siblings is that? We want all of Terra! to be rid of the wicked!...
|
by Nom DePlume Guest on 20.08.2004 [20:25 ]
|
|
|
I actually read your post, for once! Four paragraphs is about my limit, however.
Have you ever considered becoming an author, scipio? You have most of what it takes: Conveying a thought, that should only take one short sentence, and stretching it out to 5 rambling pages ;-)
|
by scipio Guest on 21.08.2004 [02:19 ]
|
|
|
Leave me alone Nom DePlume, I write what I write...Somedays, two paragraphs, somedays 50, what's your problem? If you don't like, skip it after all, I've had this same battle with LDHK et al who eventually all surrendered their swords...Do you wish to join them on the defeated list or do you wish to just read, digest, and quit complaining, you don't pay me, it is, and will remain free...
|
by Truth Seeker Guest on 21.08.2004 [04:31 ]
|
|
|
Go in Najaf if you want to battle, defeat and have people to surrender their weapons to you.
|
by Nom DePlume Guest on 21.08.2004 [11:50 ]
|
|
|
Take a pill, relax, calm down. I'm just teasin' ya.
|
by Crack Smoke Republican Guest on 21.08.2004 [20:30 ]
|
|
|
.
|
by Tet on 21.08.2004 [21:11 ]
|
|
|
Nice post, it's now an article in economics. Peace.
|
by BigBird Guest on 22.08.2004 [14:40 ]
|
|
|
All this talk about offshore banking... A first step would be rooting out the corrupt practices in the countries where the money comes from. Attacking the offshore financial system will only close a loophole for corrupt politicians and covert intelligence (ie drug and arms trafficking) operations producing all the dirty money. Probably the biggest importer of drugs in the USA is the CIA. Since Bush Sr declared the war on drugs as a national security issue, the CIA got involved and the drug trade boomed. There is a lot of evidence of this, including the CIAs own admissions of having imported and distibuted tons (literaly) of the white powder. Cure the root cause, not the symptom.
|
by mocking_bird Guest on 23.08.2004 [08:46 ]
|
|
|
well,every man to his taste
|
by mocking_bird Guest on 23.08.2004 [08:49 ]
|
|
|
I mean "committee of 300"
|
by Truth Seeker Guest on 24.08.2004 [02:52 ]
|
|
|
An interesting book. Do you know about Fritz Springmeyer, he goes much deeper in that stuff.
|
by Red Herring Guest on 24.08.2004 [03:33 ]
|
|
|
I quote:
'Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:
S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997.
At
the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore
Her
Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security
Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf,
is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is
hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to
redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United
States Law.'
But it is not explained how it makes changes in US law. In fact, the UK statute would make changes in _UK_ law _as regards the treatment of US Social Security and its relationship to that law.
You all keep on with this ludicrous 'British crown controls the US' stuff, but no one gives an actual example of Britain directly legislating for the US - which is what the claim means. That the common law or claims that arise from contract may involve Britain is no proof whatsoever of this claim.
Britain does not even legislate for Australia, where the British monarch is, technically, the head of state.
Please would someone set out JUST ONCE, SIMPLY, WITH PROOF, the claim that the British crown rules the US? It's bunkum as far as I can see.
|
by mocking_bird Guest on 24.08.2004 [07:36 ]
|
|
|
certainly not . and even cannot imagine where to go much deeper.thanks
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
