|
|
Iraqi Resistance Report for events of Tuesday, 21 December 2004
By: Muhammad Abu Nasr on: 22.12.2004 [05:11 ] (5116 reads)
 |
THE CHOW HALL THAT WAS HIT TODAY WAS THIS ONE
|
| (28211 bytes) [nc] |
 |
Temporary offline
by zhen Cheng Guest on 22.12.2004 [05:28 ] |
|
|
A big victory for Iraqi Resistance, not because of the large number killed, but the break of news blackout of Western media.
Long Live the Newly Wedded Iraqi Hero!
Long Live Iraqi Resistance!!
May the parts of US pigs eaten by the dogs!
|
by Russian Guest on 22.12.2004 [05:35 ] |
|
|
WOW!! It's getting more and more like Stalingrad for american troops :)
|
by union Guest on 22.12.2004 [05:40 ] |
|
|
I am reposting this only because I was caught at the end of the resistance report from December 21, and then this report just posted not too long after. Normally I would not do this, but thought this was relevant and timely.
OK, let us cut the "clash of the civilizations" crap, or that Iraq now symbolizes an "Atttack on the "West" or the "West must win against Islam" (what happened to the East?).
World history has confirmed that the Moors, who were Muslim, brought the foundation of Western Civilization today to Europe by way of teaching the Christian monks how to translate and transcribe older texts, most notably Greek texts of Plato and Aristotle, to Latin. In America, we learned that the period was called the "Dark Ages", (a contemporary contention as to why it was called the "Dark Ages"), and we read about the monks diligently transcribing and translating their newfound knowledge. Many historians argue, particularly European historians, that the Moors civilized Europe.
On that note, let us move to the other question of whether there have ever been any wars over "religion", and again, if you study the context of the specific historical period under debate or review, the conclusion always is the same: people fight over land.
Concepts for thought... PEACE.
|
by union Guest on 22.12.2004 [05:42 ] |
|
|
Its too late in the night for getting this right...
|
by picard (mr fortune 500) Guest on 22.12.2004 [06:30 ] |
|
|
.
|
by concerned guest Guest on 22.12.2004 [07:14 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [07:32 ] |
|
|
What do people think?
Can someone please translate the Ansar Al Sunnah statement since some news agencies are quoting them as saying "this was a martydom operation" while others are saying "this was a rocket attack"
US military did say yesterday that they thought it might be a single source of explosion!
The pictures could be of a neighbouring tent or far end of a tent. Also would the Americans really sit in a tent in town where mortars and rockets are going of everyday! Would they not nly sit in the tent if they felt the tent was outside the mortar and rocket range? Maybe the Iraqi Resistance have surprised them by firing longer range rockets and mortars?
The pictures are definetly managed. I am sure there must have been more pictures taken but not allowed for release.
Can any one get a list of who served in Mosul from Military website? I think it would be good to follow the funeral and see if they indeed have 19 funerals or 100+ funerals.
The people in Mosul said they did not notice anything different! This either means mortar/rocket attack on the base is common or indeed it was a truck bomb in which case people in Mosul town would not have necessarily know any different!! The base is outside of Mosul I think.
|
by Blue Agua Guest on 22.12.2004 [07:42 ] |
|
|
U.S Soldiers Killed.......691 (423 Fallujah+160 Mosul Bomb)
Small unnamed Helicopter.....1
Unnamed military vehicles....38 (all inside Fallujah)
Abrams Tanks dest/dis.........13
Apachee Helicopter................1
Bradleys Des/Disa.................11
Humvees Des/Dis.................25
Trucks/Tankers.....................8
|
by Seele Guest on 22.12.2004 [08:32 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:46 ] |
|
|
Where are the GIs captured by IR?
The answer may be this:
tbrnews.org/Archives/a1187.htm
November 11, 2004: “ ... a real horror story out of Iraq that is being immediately and very severely suppressed by order of the White House via the Pentagon....
... It seems that US troops entering Fallujah uncovered several so-called ‘slaughter houses’ where the Iraqi Resistance people had been killing various people. Most of this killing was done when American troops began their attack on the city. Most of the rebel leaders had long ago departed, leaving a small but fanatic rear guard in place to do as much damage to the attacking troops as they could....
... The real shocker is that the Iraqi resistance people are killing captured GIs! And badly mutilating them, hopefully after they are dead. Why are they doing this? Fanaticism? No, their rationale is that since the US has unilaterally withdrawn from the Geneva Convention (by Bush courtesy of the new AG designate Alberto Gonzales) and since US forces are well-known to have tortured and murdered legitimate Iraqi prisoners of war, they are apparently killing any and all US soldiers that fall into their hands....
... Pictures of the bodies came over today but no one wants to look at them, so terrible are the mutilations. We cannot hide the existence of these bunkers but the word is to be that only Arabs were killed there. Of course Bush does not care because, according to the now-subservient press, he has a “great mandate” from the American people...
... We all knew these atrocities would happen except for Bush and of course Gonzales is Bush’s stalking horse. Bush wants Alberto on the Supreme Court and a docile Congress will no doubt oblige the Fuehrer.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:47 ] |
|
|
Even the zionist controlled press can not lie 100% of the time, 24 hours a day. AS you can read , these 2 reporters do not give details of how bad things are going for the US forces, they only speak in general.
IF they are too honest, then the zionists will fire their as-es:
12/09/04 — Toronto Star
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:48 ] |
|
|
U.S. isn't winning against Iraqi Resistance, agencies warn
BY WARREN P. STROBEL, JOHN WALCOTT AND JONATHAN S. LANDAY
12/17/04 (Knight Ridder) --WASHINGTON -
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:48 ] |
|
|
The men agreed, and passed the word to the other platoons: nobody fires unless fired upon. As of about 1100 hours on October 10, 1971, the men of Bravo Company, 1/12, First Cav Division, declared their own private ceasefire with the North Vietnamese. For the first time since they got to Pace, it was all quiet on the Cambodian front.
Now there were no longer two sides at Pace, there were four—the lifers; the South Vietnamese, who seemed almost to be spectators; the North Vietnamese, possibly massing for a final attack; and the grunts, who, like the ARVN, were opting out. To the grunts, it wasn’t the North Vietnamese who were the enemy, it was the lifers. McAffee knew, when he heard that grunt’s bolt click, that the grunts had power. They had the machine guns, the light assault weapons. The grunts outgunned the lifers by about 30 to 1. After taking 30 percent casualties, even the artillerymen who manned the big guns had low morale. If it came down to it, most of them might join the Bravo Company rebellion rather than side with the lifers. Grana came back from the meeting with the other platoons and reported that they now had over 50 percent of the company. They were bordering on open mutiny.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:51 ] |
|
|
Nothing about these barbaric savage usan scum surprises me anymore but the the Letter from Fatimah and the rapes of iraqi women in the prison and this girl's murder is really getting to me, to the point..,that i might do something...that..., well, I wont talk about my plans for now..
US troops gun down schoolgirl defending her honor.
old news. read our site — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:54 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:57 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [09:59 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Blue Agua Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:00 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:00 ] |
|
|
November 17, 2004:
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:02 ] |
|
|
Both US intelligence (via side-angle and overhead satellites) and
foreign intelligence reports indicate that the Iranians have received
at least several Russian-made long distance rockets with nuclear
warheads included and these rockets have the ability to easily reach
domestic US targets, at least on the East Coast.
A number of ex-Russian Israeli citizens are in the Israeli defense
program and have been leaking information back to Russia with the
results that this new defense/offense program has been rapidly
accelerated.
|
by Syrian Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:02 ] |
|
|
They seem to be relaying the word from Ansaar As-Sunnah. I have always had suspicions about this certain group. No video will be released.
It's definetly a rocket/mortar attack just by looking at the damage the tent sustained. Unless "Ansaar As-Sunnah" happens to have mercedes flying trucks. Oh, and where is the truck??? Did it disappear?
Good shot guys, and enjoy your meal you USAn scum.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:07 ] |
|
|
The following is a response by an angry US marine stationed in Camp
Pendleton ...
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Spies and Traitors will be Shot. Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:08 ] |
|
|
Al Sunnah.
They are ussually right but this time they have trusted the wrong source.
Look at these pictures, and tell me the rocket didn't come from the roof.
Picture speaks a thousand words.
|
by Spies and Traitors will be Shot. Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:14 ] |
|
|
the pictures where staged
interesting.
truth will come out soon, resistance reports haven't let us down yet....
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:24 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:27 ] |
|
|
Iran Commander Says
US Dead Now Over 10,000
IRGC Commander - US, Israel Not In Position To Attack Iran
11-25-2004
TEHRAN (IRNA) - Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps
(IRGC) Major General Rahim Safavi ...
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Syrian Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:28 ] |
|
|
Or mangled chairs/tables. The only evidence of an attack is the rip in the tent. They probably don't want to show the reality of their dead.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:29 ] |
|
|
...
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:31 ] |
|
|
the web-link will suffice — moderator
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:42 ] |
|
|
Liars are many times worse than fighters, such as U.S. troops and insurgents. They both fight because they are just told and encouraged. Someday many liars, from the powerful individuals to the bums living in NYC will be kicked out.
|
by Reader Guest on 22.12.2004 [10:46 ] |
|
|
Read somewhere they had a drill last summer.
|
by Hasaan Guest on 22.12.2004 [11:09 ] |
|
|
is everybody believing in everything what is written in this so called resistance report? Arent there few things that should make some of us a little bit suspicious?!...
And why do have the resistance reporters so much trouble with just bringing up virtual footage of just 1 percent of what they are writing down?
And also, they never estimate the casualties of the USAns, they allways seem to know the exact number of fatalities which makes me quite wondering.
For example:
we have more than 15 snipers on the roof top of the falluja-hospital, which is the most elevated position of falluja. Now somehow the resistance-fighters manage to rocket those bastards to death, despite the fact, that they launch their rockets from a lower position. How could that happen? this sounds a little bit shit...also I would like to notice here, that the reporter is initially talking about more(!!) than 15 snipers and at the end we have him saying: "The Resistance fired three rockets at them, killing the(!!) 15 American soldiers" .
Might be a grammatical detail, which is not so important...but makes his tellings not more credible...
|
by predax Guest on 22.12.2004 [11:16 ] |
|
|
flooding the forum with his old posts!! FUcker.
My guess is, the hole in the roof was caused by fying debris from the truck explosion. In the news it is said that this tent could acoomodate 500 people, but the tent blown up by the truck could hold 160. So, there are two different tents.
|
by predax Guest on 22.12.2004 [11:19 ] |
|
|
quote: "And also, they never estimate the casualties of the USAns, they allways seem to know the exact number of fatalities which makes me quite wondering. "
I read an interview with a soldier who was severely wounded in a roadside bombing, who said he was lucky to be alive because "normally the resistance would approach a vehicle to kill off the wounded". This was in a western news source.
|
by Guest on 22.12.2004 [11:24 ] |
|
|
he is trying to put seeds of doubt in your mind about ir reports which have been pretty much proven to be right.
zionists, use all kinds of names to try to fool you, don't fall for their tricks. They are the scum of the earth.
|
by fly Guest on 22.12.2004 [11:29 ] |
|
|
whether they are car bombs or rockets/missiles or both, the main point the case at US's base at Mosul is still cencralized on how many casualties and disableed they are as reported totally 160.
Let's bet it greater or lesser.
Sure, greater, according to the direct hits on the crowded mass without personal armors.
|
by jake Guest on 22.12.2004 [12:23 ] |
|
|
Thats good news already!Well done, iraqi freedom fighters !May victory be swift!
|
by Xuma Cien Guest on 22.12.2004 [12:29 ] |
|
|
> The picture shows an area and most of the tables and chairs are still standing upright many looking untouched.
If you look at the position of the rip in the tent it is on one side, and it ripped not only the roof but the side as well. It is obvious that the tent in the pics was not at the center of the explosion but on the edge of it. Obviously the Pentagon did not want the real carnage to be shown.
|
by Austrian Guest on 22.12.2004 [12:38 ] |
|
|
Washington, Dec 22 - Contrack International Inc. has become the first major US contractor to pull out of the reconstruction effort in Iraq, the Los Angeles Times said Wednesday, adding that high security costs were to blame.
"We reached a point where our costs were getting to be prohibitive," company president Karim Camel-Toueg told the paper.
Contrack, based in Arlington, Virginia, had won a 325-million-dollar award to rebuild Iraq's shattered transport system.
US officials said Contrack's decision to terminate work in Iraq was reached with the US government in November, but had not been publicly disclosed.
Contrack, the leader of a partnership that won one of 12 major reconstruction contracts awarded in 2004, was the largest company to pull out of Iraq to date, the officials told the Times.
|
by jenny Guest on 22.12.2004 [12:48 ] |
|
|
The shrapnel might have broke the tent, i can't wait to see the resistance version of Boom!
Now this is what the real SHOCK AND AWE looks like.
|
by Blue Agua Guest on 22.12.2004 [12:55 ] |
|
|
The rip is in the roof of the tent,there are no rips in the side of the tent.Take a look at the picture.If the blast was outside it causing the explosion.Then Why a rip in the roof and not the sides.The same as if the explosion occured inside.There is a rip in the roof explosion goes of inside.Then Why no rips in the side of the tent.Also if the explosion is to the side as you put it,then why no rips in the side of the tent ? all we see is a rip in the roof and the rest of the tent intact in every way.An explosion that causes the deaths and injury of up to 90 people in an enclosed area has to be a very big blast.Meaning for one all the tables and chairs would be all over the place and the other there would be nothing left of the tent.Am I wrong ? (probably not).
The other situation is that there is a news black out from Iraq.But from within a few hours of this happening Mainstream media and photographers were taking pictures and writing stories from inside the camp(thats unusual).Which suggests it is either covered up in some way and not the complete story or the whole episode is a cover for something else.Around April 15th 2003.Jessica Lynch hit our screens and media.For 3 days all the news was talking about was Jessica Lynch,Jessica Lynch.In those 3 days there was a big battle at Baghdad airport of which the U.S was taking very heavy casualties.Yet none of the media around the world was reporting this because all that was on the news was Jessica Lynch,Jessica Lynch.
So for News services to be given access so quickly to Mosul and this event and it reported all over the world at a lightening speed.When there is a virtual News Blackout all over Iraq,To me that is suspicious.
Now the IRF have stated it was a car bomb and 160 minimum were killed,they also say they have recorded video evidence of it. Two very different versions of Mosul.Lets See if any thing comes out.
That still doesnt explain why there is a big rip in the roof of the tent and NO rips in the side of the tent.Wether explosion inside,outside,left or right.Would not leave a rip solely in the roof.So something does not make sense ?
|
by tiger Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:11 ] |
|
|
I have seen too many Iraqi Resistance videos of roadside-bomb explosions to not know that any explosion involving many kilograms of high-explosive produces a fireball.
So, given those tent photos, where is the burned portions of that tent? We see the tent roof torn and parts of it hanging down, but not a sign of burn damage anywhere. And also, if there had been an explosion of many kilograms of high-explosive below the point where we see the hanging parts of the torn tent roof, a lot more of that tent would have been destroyed than the small amount of destruction to that tent that we see. Even just a few kilograms of high-explosive would have done a lot more damage to that alleged target area that what we see in the photos.
So, I think those tent photos show a tent that had its roof torn by non-explosive means (perhaps by a guy with a knife). Now, if a mortar shell or small rocket had pierced that tent's roof but not exploded, then that tent-damage we see, the torn roof, could have been caused by that. But since no one is claiming that there was not an explosion, I have to conclude that those tent photos are not showing us the actual site where the attack was centered and most of the USAn troops were killed.
|
by verve Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:14 ] |
|
|
The Mosul attack made the news because obviously some GI's in the Internet Tent were online when it happened. Hard to hide that.
It's described as a huge explosion-VIED. How many tons of explosives could a Mercedes truck carry. Lots.
Welcome to shock and awe Iraqi style.
Viva la resistance
|
by verve Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:25 ] |
|
|
The resistance describe many tents in the area. You don't know what tents you are seeing pictured, the fact that you are seeing the pictures is for US public consumption. Letting them down slowly for the coda. Besides, how do you analyis a picture of god knows what, when you are thousands of miles away, and have little or no preliminary data. Use common sense. Mess hall; supper time; explosion; many dead and wounded. It is not the quanity (okay that helps) but the quality of attacks that will drive the invaders out.
Viva la resistance
|
by Xuma Cien Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:26 ] |
|
|
.
|
by Anton Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:27 ] |
|
|
That's great!!! I support the Iraqi resistance and am proud of their courage they fight with and I wish them only GOOD LUCK in their just fighting!!!!! Don't be afraid of anything, fight like the Soviet Union fought the German invaders. They also told in their propaganda they wanted to free Russians but they only killed civilians. Brothers in iraq,the whole world can see what is going on in Iraq and the whole world supports you We are with U!!!!!!!!
|
by Austrian Guest on 22.12.2004 [13:57 ] |
|
|
......for some days by American Officials!
I believe,only Rambo(Sylvester Stallone) and Indiana Jones(Harrison Ford) are fighting for the Yankees at the moment in Fallujagrad! *g*
|
by Wondering Guest on 22.12.2004 [14:26 ] |
|
|
Intresting and possbile Xuma Cien that this is US efforts to hide the real place of attack.
The people who do not believe IR reports need not to waste their time reading them. Keep watching CNN, Fox, BBC.
|
by dit Guest on 22.12.2004 [14:37 ] |
|
|
do not tell the whole story. Remember who provided us with these pictures. The lying scums of the earth did. So obviously they are not showing the pictures of the real damage. Again notice that there is a big rip in the roof of the tent with nothing destroyed inside the tent, what kind of rocket would selectively enter through the roof and NOT DO ANY DAMAGE INSIDE? Furthermore I remember the news from eveil zion sources telling us that the soldier were gathered in the dining hall mess at 4am when the so called rocket attack occured. Obviously whatever these pictures purport to show it's not the area that was attacked. Notice the picture from above was taken in broad daylight not at 4 am. Enough time for the bastards to do some fake damage in some tent to be shown to a gullible public back home. Come on guys we are not that gullible are we? A rocket attack that does so little damage? Having dinner or breakfast at 4am? it's more likely that a Mercedes truck laden with explosives (or rocket or missile) slamming some other area of that camp (that we have no pictures of). Be suspicious of the source of the so called 'evidence'
|
by Austrian Guest on 22.12.2004 [14:42 ] |
|
|
.
|
|
RSS feed for articles and news
